doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion Classic & Custom Single Barreled Sporting Rifles @ doublegunshop.com My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?

November
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30

Who's Online Now

2 members (WJW, 1 invisible), 305 guests, and 6 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Forum Statistics

Forums10

Topics39,567

Posts562,852

Members14,597

Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025

Print Thread

Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better? buckstix #363769 04/09/14 07:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 678 Likes: 15 Gaithersburg, Md Gary D. Sidelock
Gary D. Sidelock Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 678 Likes: 15 Gaithersburg, Md	Either way, it would be fun to watch it being shot. I would pass when it came my turn. Almost 50 years of shooting has left me with a flinch that's lurking just under the surface begging to be let out by a shoulder mounted anti-tank gun! Last edited by Gary D.; 04/09/14 07:52 PM.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	buckstix	03/26/14 05:27 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	bonny	03/27/14 04:23 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	buckstix	03/27/14 05:45 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	Ken Nelson	03/27/14 05:02 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	BrentD, Prof	04/09/14 12:08 AM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	buckstix	04/09/14 03:14 AM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	Mike A.	04/09/14 04:43 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	Der Ami	04/09/14 07:18 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	WJL	04/09/14 09:39 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	BrentD, Prof	04/09/14 09:56 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	buckstix	04/10/14 02:56 AM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	Gary D.	04/10/14 12:50 AM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	WJL	04/10/14 07:17 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	buckstix	04/10/14 11:46 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	BrentD, Prof	04/10/14 07:19 PM
Re: My new 600 JDJ Ruger No.1 - is "BIGGER" better?	WJL	04/10/14 10:11 PM

Link Copied to Clipboard

Updated every minute of everyday!

Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.395s Queries: 17 (0.375s) Memory: 0.8180 MB (Peak: 1.8992 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-11-07 05:01:12 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS