|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
2 members (Chuckster, 1 invisible),
631
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,499
Posts562,108
Members14,586
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,893 Likes: 651
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,893 Likes: 651 |
I am in the middle of doing a pair of Remington 1894's for two of my sons to use after I am long gone. So I understand your desire to build what you want and not care about cost or recovery of your investment.
I did a Fox re-chamber years ago. It was a 16 ga. extractor with 30" barrels with chambers that were ruined by two paper shells stored for four or five decades. I am talking about pitting like the craters on the back side of the moon. I chamber sleeved it down to a 20 gauge. It is long range death on doves and pigeons. So much so that I have another donor gun that I am hoping to sleeve to 20 for a second one to pass along.
To your selection list. I rather have extractors than ejectors. Cool only works with others around to see your coolness and I tend to hunt a lot alone or with just one of my sons. And sons know dads are not cool. Not having to work around ejectors inletting give you a lot more flexibility on how you make the fore end. I have been thinking about trying a semi beaver-tail fore end, long and trim with a small Schnabel tip or other shaped end point. Figure to make one and try it, change it as desired and then if it works well use a nice fore end blank to make the real one using it as a pattern.
If you have the time and money I would be thinking in terms of a pair of guns. Perhaps a 28" and a 30" pair with different chokes but the same basic stocks. Kind of a near and far set of guns. Make what you want and enjoy both the process and the product because it is fun to upgrade a gun and see if it meets your goals.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Brian
|
03/03/14 11:20 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
cgs
|
03/03/14 11:35 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
mc
|
03/03/14 11:39 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
SKB
|
03/04/14 12:40 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Robt. Harris
|
03/04/14 01:26 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
KY Jon
|
03/04/14 01:17 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Joe Wood
|
03/04/14 02:07 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Stanton Hillis
|
03/04/14 02:36 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
jmc
|
03/04/14 02:59 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Anonymous
|
03/04/14 04:46 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Wild Skies
|
03/04/14 04:52 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
03/04/14 05:04 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Chuck H
|
03/04/14 05:56 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
redoak
|
03/04/14 06:02 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
JNW
|
03/04/14 04:04 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
xs hedspace
|
03/04/14 05:42 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Bob Blair
|
03/04/14 06:04 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
KY Jon
|
03/04/14 07:04 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Terry Buffum
|
03/04/14 08:05 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Rich A
|
03/04/14 10:51 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Gunflint Charlie
|
03/05/14 12:09 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
mc
|
03/05/14 03:11 AM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Rich A
|
03/06/14 02:40 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Norm
|
03/06/14 08:01 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
redoak
|
03/06/14 09:37 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
Kutter
|
03/07/14 10:21 PM
|
Re: Fox Upgrade, opinions wanted
|
eightbore
|
03/07/14 11:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|