|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,731
Posts564,754
Members14,615
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492 |
Thank you Joe!
Will ask if metal fatigue starts with visible (microscopic) changes.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,696 Likes: 226
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,696 Likes: 226 |
If you have the hulls previously fired before the event Do they all have intact base wads? Mike
USAF RET 1971-95
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492 |
All the hulls are one piece, and intact; no missing plastic inside or out.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,859 Likes: 121
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,859 Likes: 121 |
If you have the hulls previously fired before the event Do they all have intact base wads? Mike As this was brought up before, all Remington hulls are one-piece plastic. Joe, beat me to it, I was going to do the same, thanks.
Last edited by JDW; 02/07/14 01:50 PM.
David
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492 |
Bro David: quit messing around with reloads and get those pics of your 0 grade to me; right, top, left and the "Smith Farm Implement" article is done! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,859 Likes: 121
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,859 Likes: 121 |
Drew, I will. I talked to Jim and he said you were doing this one, so I will get them to you very soon.
Thanks again for the great work that FINALLY had to come out. I know the outcome will be beneficial to all.
I just read ninepointer's post and makes for another interesting story and hopefully does not apply to small bore guns for those of us that like to shoot these old guns.
David
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,111 Likes: 83
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,111 Likes: 83 |
Drew: Is there ANY chance at all that this was a 20/12 accident?
"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492 |
Not according to the shooter, and you were the 2nd place winner of earliest correct diagnosis 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,716 Likes: 348
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,716 Likes: 348 |
Only a quick question, and not making a judgement. What are the characteristics of a ring bulge. Is there any thought as to why the interior of the barrel that's opposite the blow out does not seem to be pressure affected (on appearance).
The orange peel look of the plastic type deformation of the affected area seems clear. Even if not deformed to the same extent, I'd guess the normal appearing part of the barrel was subject to the same pressure that started bulge prior to it letting go.
There's also a good sized looking pit in the deformed area and signs that some machining may have been done for maybe typical reasons that cleaning up may be done. I'm only curious, and would agree that an obstruction might easily have happened.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,826 Likes: 492 |
Craig: It is hard to tell from small images, but the 'pit' is a crack, and the 'machine marks' are the crolle pattern 
|
|
|
|
|