Originally Posted By: AmarilloMike


Until you get down to numbers I don't understand how you can claim Dr. Jones is wrong about his statistically calculated number of one pellet breaks.

I am trying to understand Larry's argument that since one hit unbroken clays are extant Dr. Jones' calculation of the frequency of one hit breaks is wrong.


I've read this thread 3 times. Where exactly did Larry claim that Dr. Jones was "wrong?"