Larry could you explain to me how the existence of unbroken targets with one pellet hole in them contradicts Dr. Jones studies on the subject.
He says one pellet breaks happen at a certain frequency - 1/100 or 3/1000 or something like that.
Everyone agrees that not all one pellet hits result in a break. And you stated that fact.
How does your statement contradict Dr. Jones conclusions about the frequency of one pellet breaks?
Do you also contend that no one pellet hits result in a break?
Until you get down to numbers I don't understand how you can claim Dr. Jones is wrong about his statistically calculated number of one pellet breaks.
Not challenging, trying to understand the debate.
Thanks,
Mike
Last edited by AmarilloMike; 02/02/14 12:45 PM.
