Really, don't you see a "trend".
Nope. What I see is propaganda and inaccurate "reporting." This is from the link you posted:
studies have shown that there is no perceivable difference in accuracy or efficacy between lead and non-lead ammunition, and that some alternatives, like copper, even have advantages over their lead counterparts.
The reality of the situation is that requiring the use of non-lead ammunition for hunting is an easy way to make the environment that much less toxic to wildlife, and to us. If the survival of the condor isn’t enough of a motivating factor for AZ residents to join the movement to “get the lead out,” perhaps the thought of increasing the amount of toxic lead in the human body by 50% by eating lead-laced venison is.
No perceivable difference between lead and non-lead ammo? Really? Wonder where they got that factoid. Increasing toxic lead in the human body by 50% by eating lead-laced venison? Again, really? How does one "lace" the backstrap of a deer with lead? Pure biased bullshit that does not fly in Arizona (pun is completely intentional). So far, the AZ legislators and regulators are too smart for that crap, and are doing a decent job of representing their constituents' interests.
