| | 
| 
 
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |  
|  |  |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |  
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |  
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |  
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |  | 
 |  
| 
 
| Forums10 Topics39,553 Posts562,659 Members14,593 |  | Most Online9,918Jul 28th, 2025
 | 
 | 
 
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  May 2011 Posts: 765 Likes: 2 Sidelock |  
| OP   Sidelock 
 Joined:  May 2011 Posts: 765 Likes: 2 | 
Would roll crimping shotshells substantially reduce the pressure buildup from the crimp unfolding into a short chamber? Roll crimping is way shorter than fold crimps...Steve |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jul 2005 Posts: 7,065 Likes: 1 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Jul 2005 Posts: 7,065 Likes: 1 | 
After firing a 2-1/2" shell that is pie crimped is the same length as a 2-1/2" shell that is roll crimped.  You should be able to get more stuff in the roll crimped cartridge but with modern dense powders excess room is usually the problem.
 I am a member of 16 gauge reloaders group.  As I remember what I read there a roll crimp adds about 1000 psi over a pie crimp.
 
 Best,
 
 Mike
 
 
 I am glad to be here.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2001 Posts: 3,971 Likes: 103 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Dec 2001 Posts: 3,971 Likes: 103 | 
No,  it is the fired length that counts. 
 John McCain is my war hero.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Apr 2012 Posts: 753 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Apr 2012 Posts: 753 | 
Joe is right
 
 the length is the length -  and it is measured unloaded - new or fired
 
 the type of crimp may affect the finished length -
 
 and most data I have seen is that a roll crimp -all else being equal- slightly reduces pressure
 
 I believe Sherman Bell mentions this in his DGJ articles on short ten loads
 
 added- on page 30 volume 12 issue 1
 
Last edited by OH Osthaus; 08/21/13 10:52 AM.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Oct 2006 Posts: 1,544 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Oct 2006 Posts: 1,544 | 
You may also consider the effect of the over shot card on your patterns. They can be affected for the worse. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Mar 2011 Posts: 4,206 Likes: 648 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Mar 2011 Posts: 4,206 Likes: 648 | 
I believe Mike misquoted himself.    Roll crimped loads generally reduce pressure compared with the same load if it were star crimped.  For a moment I thought it was a post by ArmadilloMike.   
Last edited by GLS; 08/21/13 08:25 PM.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jul 2005 Posts: 7,065 Likes: 1 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Jul 2005 Posts: 7,065 Likes: 1 | 
 
 I am glad to be here.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2002 Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Jan 2002 Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 | 
Roll crimping allows maximum volume for the load (powder, wad, and shot) for a given hull length (fired length!!).  Both the 2 1/2" and 2 3/4" hull lengths existed before the rise of star/pie crimping.  To match the usual 2 1/2" loads with a pie crimp shell it was "necessary" to go to the 2 3/4" hull, but not to load the heavy loads they have volume for if roll crimped. 
 The use of known low pressure pie crimped loads in 2 3/4" hulls in 2 1/2" chambers is well documented.  If the load is of "low" pressure, there is no objectionable pressure increase from the 2 3/4" crimp opening into the forcing cone of a 2 1/2" chamber.  This was well documented at the time of introduction of 2 3/4" pie crimps as more or less "standard" fare.  Unfortunately, said documentation seems to have fallen out of common/street knowledge. The advent of interest in shooting Brit/Continental game guns has led to the rediscovery/reinvention of this knowledge.  Always keep in mind that SAAMI (USA) loads allow higher pressure than do CIP (Europe).  The taboo of 2 3/4" shells in a 2 1/2" chamber has, or at least should have, more to do with the higher allowed SAAMI pressures than with the hull length difference.
 
 DDA
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2002 Posts: 11,574 Likes: 167 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Jan 2002 Posts: 11,574 Likes: 167 | 
  Always keep in mind that SAAMI (USA) loads allow higher pressure than do CIP (Europe).  The taboo of 2 3/4" shells in a 2 1/2" chamber has, or at least should have, more to do with the higher allowed SAAMI pressures than with the hull length difference.
 DDA
There's the long shell/short chamber wisdom, in a nutshell.  Per Bell's tests, reported in DGJ, a longer shell in a shorter chamber will result in SOME increase in pressure, usually several hundred psi--some of which can be offset if the forcing cone is lengthened.  But the major issue is not the length of the fired shell. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Aug 2006 Posts: 931 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Aug 2006 Posts: 931 | 
Per Bell's tests, reported in DGJ, a longer shell in a shorter chamber will result in SOME increase in pressure, usually several hundred psiI have a question about these tests. Did Bell use plastic or paper hulls, or both? Shot cups or felt/fiber wads? |  |  |  
 | 
 |