It is a true statement. America voted twice in a row for Obama, as they voted twice in a row for Bush, and so on. Canada also changes its mind regularly on governance. I don't think you're suggesting that morons and wise men are providing alternating mandates, that those who voted for Obama are lesser persons.
King, it sounds like you are answering Doug's post here, but I cannot believe you actually read what he said. Either that, or you are deliberatly trying to change the meaning and content of his very clear words.
Unless I'm dellusional, it looked to me as if Doug was saying that Obama was re-elected due to massive voter fraud. I would have to agree, because it's physically impossible to have voter turnouts in some precints of 150% of registered voters. It is statistically nearly impossible to have very large precints where even one voter was either illiterate, or simply made an error and voted for Romney. It is crazy to think that there was really less Republican voter enthusiasm for Romney in 2012 than for McCain in 2008, and that several million less turned out to vote in 2012. It is crazy to think that we didn't have millions more simply voting for anyone but Obama this time versus in 2008 when he was more of an unknown quantity.
But you conveniently and deliberatly ignore this just as you pretend to ignore the fact that there are "grabbers" right here on this forum, and you also ignore the fact that these "grabbers", to a man, supported and continue to support Obama. Not one who claimed he supported gun rights has disavowed him or criticized him for revealing his true anti-gun colors.
When we sometimes categorize these "grabbers" as "grabbers", we are not putting anyone through "Wasserman tests" and alienating potential allies. We are simply calling a spade a shovel... something you refuse to do with any flaming liberal notions exhibited here ever. You say you are not dreaming. I believe you. I believe you because you do it all the time and it's become very obvious that doing so is your concious intent. Doug says it's wearing rose colored glasses. Doug is being too kind. I think it's not nearly so innocent.
P.S. You could have referenced me by name as the guy who called John Boehner a RINO. I don't run from my words or pretend I didn't say them. I have no hidden agenda. Boehner kept this country on the path to certain insolvency and eventual bankruptcy with costs that will be borne by our kids and grandkids. Acquiescing and working with self destructive forces is not my idea of intelligent or admirable.
