S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
5 members (canvasback, oskar, 3 invisible),
824
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,493
Posts562,053
Members14,585
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,720 Likes: 1357
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,720 Likes: 1357 |
The gun appears to have a pretty robust Greener crossbolt and a top lever. I don't believe it is a snap underlever. There is a French term for that decorative piece on the front of the trigger guard, but, I've forgotten it.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572 Likes: 165 |
 I've seen one source that gave the mark(red enclosed) as a Definitive stamp from 1879 - 1885/1886 with the pairing of the Crown over Crossed Palms St. Etienne(blue enclosed) being the Provisional proofmark. So either way the use of this mark should bound the date of production? Where is this term "HOYAU ETAMPES"? Kind Regards, Raimey rse Raimey, Lee Kennett refers to both marks as black powder proof of semi-finished barrels, the mark in blue replacing the one in red in 1879. Baron Engelhardt also dates the mark in red from 1869 and the one in blue from 1879, and does not specifically state that the latter replaced the former, although that appears to be the case. But at any rate, if the gun was made prior to 1897, we should be able to determine that from a photo of the barrel flats, which we don't have. In the 1890's, several additional proofmarks appeared (including all of those for smokeless powders, such as PJ, PM, PT etc all with a crown). If any of those are present, it would mean a gun more recent than the 1880's, and would cause one to wonder why the mark in red is there. Ted, the French term for the piece in front of the trigger guard is une doodad (or maybe un doodad--can't recall whether masculine or feminine). 
Last edited by L. Brown; 01/03/13 09:15 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,720 Likes: 1357
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,720 Likes: 1357 |
A lot of pre 1890 guns had that thing, Larry. I've seen 'em on French damascus guns, and an old C model Darne and asked Paul Bruchet what it was called when I was last there. He gave me the name. I forgot the name, most likely because I couldn't think of something more useless on a gun. My gun, anyway.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572 Likes: 165 |
Seriously Ted, the all-purpose French term for pretty much anything for which you don't know the name is "un truc". Sort of like doodad, thingamabob, whatsit, etc. With that essentially useless piece, I'm not sure I'd bother asking the name.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 11 |
Thanks for all the info. Learning alot about this gun and old shotguns in general. I'll be taking photos of the barrel flats today and will post them as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 11 |
Here is what lies on the barrel flats. Does any of this give a clearer picture on the date of manufacture? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,217 Likes: 28
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,217 Likes: 28 |
No, but it indicates your gun started out its life with a good set of barrels. Ronchard-Cizeron was one of the "better" makers and barrellers.
fiery, dependable, occasionally transcendent
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,720 Likes: 1357
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,720 Likes: 1357 |
Proof with Powder J is one you don't see much of, as it is old. Correctly noted above, it is semi-smokeless, and doesn't develop the pressure level of true smokeless powder. If it were me, I'd use low pressure loads in it. Certainly looks to be an entertaining shooter.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,553
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,553 |
java' How is the action/stock fit? I think I can see some fair gaps in the first set o pic's..#s 1 2 & 5, there looks to be a few pushing an 1/8", especially the #5 side shot of wood/metal? Looks like the wood needs to be snugged up some to the action...are all the screw tight,stock draw bolt?  some might be shadow, but daylight is daylight I'd want to check that before I shot it much, that's all I mean cheers Franc
Last edited by Franc Otte; 01/04/13 08:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
|