|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,498
Posts562,100
Members14,586
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
Lordy - that is high art gunmaking.
Note the short trigger tang on the gun I am looking at - that confirms in my mind Raimey's suggestion of how this gun was originally stocked (pistol grip, cheekpiece).
Last edited by Doverham; 02/02/12 10:26 AM.
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,082 Likes: 379
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,082 Likes: 379 |
And I'm pretty confident they were using old machines, getting back to basics utilizing pre-WWII components if any. The mechanics had to be very resourceful.
Kind Regards,
Raimey
rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,082 Likes: 379
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,082 Likes: 379 |
Most XVIIIs I've seen had the pistol grip and yes a straight-hand grip would more than likely have the longer triggerguard bow. Also other than the Doll's head extension and some elaborate adornment, the one you are looking at is pretty much mechanically the same. Like I said quite the workhorse.
Kind Regards,
Raimey
rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 53
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 53 |
Raimey,
yes, you're right: it's a model XVII. didn't notice the ejectors.
Regards
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
