S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,591
Posts546,778
Members14,425
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 67
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 67 |
Actually, there are two styles of Miller installation in the Model 32, the earlier one developed by Elmer is somewhat more complex. Like the Winchester Model 21 installation I believe the first style in the M32 involved making new hammers. Apparently, Howard on the late M32 installation simplified it a bit. The Model 32 single trigger is not very good and the Miller is a dramatic improvement (I've owned both...) As far as ALL genuine Miller triggers being marked "MILLER", that's not completely accurate. The only problem (IMHO)with the Miller is the rather homely, oversized appearance of the trigger blade itself. They were masters of the file but as Howard and Delbert got older the triggers got chunkier. I know of a number of Miller triggered guns that have trigger blades filed and shaped into a more elegant trigger blade yet are genuine Miller installed units. My Purdey pigeon gun is one. The rocker gives it away as a later Miller but the trigger blade has been carefully shaped and looks Purdey. I know of a few others where one of the early nicely spoon shaped Fox front triggers was used to replace the blade of a Miller.
Last edited by 11F; 12/23/11 08:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,438 Likes: 316
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,438 Likes: 316 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 161
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 161 |
11F,
I knew as soon as I wrote that, someone would ding me on it! You are correct in that it is possible to find an unmarked (on the outside) trigger that is genuine Miller. As you pointed out some were shaped and filed in such a way that there was no surface left to support a stamping. If the unit is removed from the gun however you should find patent date stamps and/or other Miller markings inside. There is also the story of the disagreement between Ithaca and Miller wherein some triggers were installed for Ithaca by Miller and were not stamped. If anyone ever has a question on whether their trigger is original Miller work I can usually tell quite easily by looking at the mechanism. Elmer and Howard's work was distinctive.
Best, Dan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 67
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 67 |
Dan- Thanks, I am sure you can, indeed, tell as a skilled gunsmith which I am not let alone now owning the Miller name. I recently took a DHE Parker with a non-selective Miller (marked Miller!)to my friend (who is a skilled trigger 'smith himself- he once fixed a Boss single trigger for me, now that was something to see spread all over the bench...) and he noted it was "Some of Howard's most beautiful work". Millers are terrific triggers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16 |
Dan, I have a nicely restored 20's era NID that has a factory SST which I think may be a copy of the Miller design. It will occasionally double with heavy loads or randomly. Is this a trigger you work on? Is there reliable fix?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,280 Likes: 211
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,280 Likes: 211 |
Chuck, the restored gun you picture does not look like the same gun as the pictures below, sans stock. Can you clarify ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 161
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 161 |
Chuck,
Everyone involved in the Ithaca/Miller unpleasantness is either dead or probably doesn't care anymore, so....Ithaca (in my opinion) did steal Miller's base design. The Ithaca version was known as the "Howland" trigger (named after their designer Harry Howland). The only difference that I can find between the two is that the Howland trigger has a two-piece trigger body as opposed to the Miller's one-piece. There is absolutely no reason for this design difference as far as function goes and I feel it is superfluous and weakens the design. The Howland is still a great trigger though because it is essentially a Miller!
I can absolutely fix your doubling problem. Give me a call, email or just send her out.
11F,
I've done quite a few minor repairs and tweaks of both Elmer's and Howard's previous installations. They were indeed amazing craftsmen and gifted with mechanical genius. I wish I could have met them before they passed. I hope they are happy with our carrying on of their business, I'd like to think so.
Dan
Last edited by cgs; 12/23/11 04:32 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,399 Likes: 15
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,399 Likes: 15 |
Well Dan, I am still alive and I care. (can't get the smile icon to go here) Won't argue the point though. My New York State son has a Howland trigger that needs you. We will get the gun up to you in the new year.
Last edited by Walter C. Snyder; 12/23/11 05:33 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 161
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 161 |
Walt,
Sounds good! The Ithaca/Miller feud is just another interesting anecdote from our beloved doublegun history. We're all one big happy family now!! I love Ithacas and I own Miller, I'm caught squarely in the middle! How do I get myself into these situations.....
Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! That goes for everyone!!
Dan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 411
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 411 |
Chuck, try a lighter spring on the inertia block. Bill
|
|
|
|
|