vangulil,
The Nightforce scope looks perfect, unfortunately I'm one of these people known to the world as frugal (though my late wife preferred the word "cheap" to describe me). I'd have a problem spending $1200 for one of those bad boys. I guess my own God-given optics will have to do for at least a few more years.
Steve
PS I prefer the word frugal because whereas I won't necessarily pay extra for a name, I will pay extra for quality.
It isn't "Frugal" and it definitely isn't "cheap". You're a "value purchaser".
Jaycee
The problem is that when walking around while hunting I do have to wear them to be able to see properly and have to take them off before aiming and shooting.
That's exactly my problem, and I'm unwilling to ditch the glasses for fear of overlooking something downrange which I should see. That's why I'm considering going back to iron.
Anyway, $1200 is several times what my rifles (1976 Remmie M788 LH in .308, 1955 Marlin 39A) are worth....
