S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,492
Posts562,042
Members14,585
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 130
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 130 |
Does anyone know of anything that would cause a barrel bulge about 18" in front of the chamber except a bore obstruction?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812 |
cleaning solution or oil not patched out?
jack
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
Low probability, but shot bridging could do it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457 Likes: 336
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457 Likes: 336 |
Shot "leaking" from a cartridge before firing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
Would that not be a type of barrel obstruction, Daryl?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457 Likes: 336
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457 Likes: 336 |
Of course shot leaking would be an unexpected or unnoticed obstruction type. Not in the same way a stuck wad, snow, or other barrel obstruction by a foreign source that could be seen "before" putting the shell in the chamber. I guess if one takes your line of thought, excess oil or cleaning fluid would be an obstruction, too. But since the problem of a leaking shell or shot bridging, as you say, could not be seen prior to loading and firing, I would consider them similarly. Each causes an obstruction at some point.
Last edited by Daryl Hallquist; 08/25/11 11:08 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,028 Likes: 125
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,028 Likes: 125 |
If barrel wall thickness is adequate, it just about has to be an obstruction in the barrel of some sort. Retained patch? Who knows? Another lesson: chec your barrels very very frequently!!!
Socialism is almost the worst.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
My guess would be that a bulge at 18" has an Ivory Soap percentile (99.98% Pure) chance of being an obstruction. I have seen some reports, which appeared to be verified, of a bulge or burst occuring from a phenonimum of the shot charge itself acting as an obstruction. This occured from incomplete combustion of the powder charge getting the shot a ways down the bore & then the burn increasing & the gases rushing down to catch up with the slow moving shot which created the obstruction. This can occur with the first shot from a verified clean, unobstructed bore. Some feel this may well have been a problem with the early smokeless powders which didn't ignite as easiy as had black, but were often loaded using the same primers. Smokeless powder in Damascus of course received the entire blame. This is one of the reasons I am not a proponent of very low pressure loads utilizing slow powders behind light shot loads. This however would normally occur much closer to the breech than 18", so I would still opine an obstruction.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,028 Likes: 125
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,028 Likes: 125 |
Shooting BOOMERS in a gun not proofed for boomers????
Socialism is almost the worst.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 130
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 130 |
These were sabot's shot through a new rifled barrel. The barrel was proofed. I have had a couple of reports all with the same mfg of shells. And the reports was that it was not the first shot in the session, could a piece of the sabot from the previous shot be left behind?
|
|
|
|
|