I thought you might enjoy that.
So, tell me again why we proof guns.
If I built a bridge for a one ton truck, and then drove a two ton truck over it just to 'prove' it would hold a one ton truck... and it sagged, but then came back to the original shape...
Haven't I just put more fatigue into the bridge structure than a million one ton trucks?
Seems like all I've 'proved' is that it held a two ton truck once.
As a result I now have a well used instead of new bridge, that could fail from fatigue any time.
On the other subject... three pilots sat there adding 'nose up' the whole time? If your attitude is +15, and your flight path is -15, take a wild guess as to the angle of attack...
I have to believe the fly-by-magic systems were preventing the crew from unstalling it. Like the Paris airshow... the airplane thinks it's smarter than the crew. Stalled for three minutes and no clue? I wouldn't accuse even Air France of that.
