October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
2 members (dirty harry, SKB), 442 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,496
Posts562,075
Members14,586
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 78
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 78
Stan, you're right. Catching shells from an ejector gun becomes so second nature that when you switch to an extractor only gun you still cover the breech with your hand to the point that it's a difficult habit to stop.


"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 683
I think English hunting where the shooting was fast and furious (and where they had someone else to pick up the shells) ejectors were necessary. I can go either way.

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 102
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 102
I don't know about English guns, but I prefer both ejectors & extractors and my Syracuse A grade can't be beat in that department. In fast and furious shooting action like "live" barn yard pigeon shooting you have very little time to reload, so I prefer ejectors. But on a "moving forward" hunts like long cornfield pheasant hunts I like extractors, so I don't litter.

http://www.imagenerd.com/uploads/on_off_ejectors-JAxRe.jpg
http://www.imagenerd.com/uploads/on_off_ejectors_switch-8nUiJ.jpg

21

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 1
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: Stan
I guess I'm still running against the wind, but after 50 years of shooting double guns, I still prefer ejectors.

Your question was concerning OLD ENGLISH guns with ejectors. I have no first-hand knowledge of this, not owning any old English ejector guns. However, given the penchant of owners of them to play the unreliability card, maybe they know something I don't, that is, that old English guns had unreliable ejector systems. I think more likely, though, is the idea that the opponents of ejectors just don't like them kicking their shells out on the ground, and haven't learned the childishly simple task of catching them as they do eject. Anyone who can use double triggers successfully certainly possesses the dexterity to catch two empties as they are ejected, right into your hand.

If, indeed, there was/is a reliability issue with ejectors in old English guns it was certainly solved by most current makers of good double guns. Ejector reliability just is not an issue with Perazzi, Beretta, Kreighoff,Kolar,and multitudes of other doubles built in the last 40 years or so.


I'm in the same camp as Stan here. I've shot ejector guns most of the time and have never had a problem with retaining empties by simply cupping my hand over the chambers upon opening the gun.
I don't think there's any question that ejectors add value to a gun.
If you really don't like ejectors it's usually a straight forward task to disable them and then re-activate them when you sell the gun.
Jim


The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,850
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,850
I hunt with a Model 1889 Remington 10 bore and a Model 1900 Remington 12 bore. The 12 bore has ejectors and the 10 has extractors. I prefer the ejectors. I guess I'm like Elmer Keith, old and set in my ways. Like Keith says in his book Shotguns By Keith, "It's a pleasure to use a fine double with ejectors.....you hear the soft "punk" of the ejector locks." When I open the 1900 it kicks the empties on the ground so close they kiss each other. So what if I have to take two steps back to pick them up. At my age I need the excersise.

Last edited by J.R.B.; 05/01/11 12:35 PM.

Practice safe eating. Always use a condiment.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883
Likes: 19
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883
Likes: 19
I prefer an ejector gun, if the cocking mechanism is timed so it doesn't hold the gun slightly closed, preventing a new shell from being fully inserted. I have a couple guns like this. It's a pain.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
If the subject is English bespoke hammerless ejector or extractor guns, I'll vote for the ejectors, they seem to have overall better finish and attention to detail. I suppose if the buyer could afford an ejector, he would also pay extra for those nice touches that set guns apart.

In regards to the usefullness of the ejectors, they're nice at the target range, less distraction and wasted time pulling out empties plus it typically is not littering to let them hit the ground. In the field ejectors are usually unneccessary and lead to littering (once they hit the ground, that's where they stay). Also if the ejector springs make closing the gun take significantly extra effort, it becomes tiresome. I shot an AYA 10 that could throw empties six feet but closing it in a pit blind was a real PITA.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,013
Likes: 1817
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,013
Likes: 1817
The idea that ejectors are useless for hunting today is also one that I disagree with. But, this is relative, relative to the type hunting/ shooting in the field that one engages in.

I can see where a grouse/woodcock hunter would have no need for ejectors. Quail hunting, too, may be something that one would not NEED ejectors for, though my quail guns have 'em. Usually, two shots on a covey rise is aplenty.

I, however, do a lot of dove shooting in fields where the birds may all pile in at the same time, offering fast paced shooting for a few minutes. With a limit of 15, I want to fill it if at all possible. Many times the circumstances calls for as fast a reloading as I can do. I spent one whole season shooting an extractor Sterlingworth, and though I enjoyed the gun very much, I wasted many, many shot opportunities while digging empties out of the chambers. There were shoots that left me with broken fingernails, it was so furious.

I can reload an ejector gun much faster, and I can leisurely pick up my empties around my stand after my limit is filled. I prefer ejectors for ducks for the exact same reason. In my case, "once the empties hit the ground it is" NOT "where they lay"!

Call me a game hog if you wish, I don't think I am. But, I shoot my limit everytime I can, and love eating them all. I make no apologies for that. And ejectors make it easier and more fun for me.

SRH


May God bless America and those who defend her.
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,850
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,850
Originally Posted By: Stan

But, I shoot my limit everytime I can, and love eating them all. I make no apologies for that. And ejectors make it easier and more fun for me.

SRH

Amen Stan. I eat them all too but I also eat all of them. Meaning when I shoot a pheasant I don't just take the breast. I clean and cook the whole bird, nothing wasted except guts and feathers.


Practice safe eating. Always use a condiment.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 127
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 127
I prefer extractors. i don't have to worry about the empties go flying out of the breech when I open the gun. So much easier to pull them out of the breech, instead of having to go look for them. When I bought my Browning Superposed in 1970, I had the ejector springs pulled. I hate that no pick up rule that one runs across at the trap and skeet range. When I bought my Bernardelli back in 1990, it came with extractors.


Colin L. Kendall
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.179s Queries: 35 (0.149s) Memory: 0.8547 MB (Peak: 1.9022 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-08 18:02:01 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS