|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (L. Brown),
367
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,586
Posts546,751
Members14,425
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,265 Likes: 84
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,265 Likes: 84 |
This is a thread that I hope will let folks discuss the various makers and their designs of side mounted scope mounts. We all know of the G&H but there were others. (and certainly G&H is not excluded, please don't get me wrong). Michael P, on another thread, just displayed the pics of a Niedner mount on a Newton rifle. Lets show others. Pics, plus's and minus's would be interesting. American, British and European.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
The first side mount that I know of in the USA was made by Noske. Noske Patent
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,265 Likes: 84
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,265 Likes: 84 |
Here is a link to pictures of the Noske: Noske Pictures Very interesting, I think you can see that G&H used this patent to help with their patents. IMHO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
Since one reason for choosing a sidemount was/is to clear the receiver for iron sight use, my vote goes to the G&H. It is the least obtrusive when the scope is removed, and as installed by G&H and some others with base screwheads and pins machined off and polished over, the least messy looking.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
There were a slew of different Noske mounts, I see new ones all the time.
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,265 Likes: 84
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,265 Likes: 84 |
What do you think of the Niedner that M.P. showed on the Newton?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
I'm not sure who was next , Niedner or G&H.
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,265 Likes: 84
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,265 Likes: 84 |
AO does not appear to have patented his mount. The Niedner appears to slide off its mount perpendicular to the action while the Noske and G&H are parallel to the action, is that correct? Do the 2 large slotted screw attach the mount to the base which is attached to the action? The screw at the front appears to maybe be the windage adjustment? Sorry for all the questions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
None of the Niedner scope mounts were patented.
They slid off just as the Noske and G&H do, the screws tighten the mount like the lever(s) on the G&H.
All scope mounts of this vintage had windage in the mounts, the German scopes only had elevation.
The Mauser above is a Niedner in .257-Roberts with a Shelhamer stock. When I got it over thirty years ago I shot a five-shot group with the Hensoldt scope, then removed and replaced it, every shot, for the next group, both groups the same size and same place.
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|