Phil:
You have what I consider the proper approach. Americans, as respectable as they are, seem consumed with things that are "like new in the box" or "restored to new."
This is fine if you're into such things. But to me, a gun that is 100+ years old (and has not been abused) is a trove of mystery and wonderment. All the dings and cosmetic flaws bespeak its unique and incomparable history. "Restoration" erases all that. And thus, erases my interest in the piece.
Granted, abused and neglected guns, cars, aircraft and homes are often better off with "restoration." But I'd much rather have a slightly "used" original E-Type Jaguar, Mk VI Spit, or Holland Royal than any restored version of same. It's the romantic in me. Nothing more.
You be the judge. That's what this game is all about. Not so much concensus. But it does make an interesting thread.
Best, Kensal.
