|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,493
Posts562,055
Members14,586
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 110
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 110 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457 Likes: 336
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457 Likes: 336 |
Craig, it's an Infallible Single Selective trigger , not uncommonly found on guns after the turn of the century. I believe Lancaster Arms [or similar] offered them and there was even an office in Suhl. Can't say for sure on the gun itself. Could it be the Facile Princeps design of Greener, sometimes seen made in Germany. I do not see any Anson Deeley cocking lugs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 792 Likes: 36
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 792 Likes: 36 |
There's a lot there that reminds me of a Fox, excepting the lockup with Greener bolt. A prototype built on a Philadelphia Arms frame? Just a SWAG.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,945 Likes: 144
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,945 Likes: 144 |
The trigger plate looks A.H. Fox Gun Co., not at all Philadelphia Arms Co. Wonder if it was an early prototype for the Ansley H. Fox gun that was later fitted with the Infallible Single Trigger. Interesting historical piece. Double Gun Journal article?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 231
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 231 |
When is a Fox not a Fox!!
BD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,249 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,249 Likes: 6 |
Frame and innards look remarkably like a Fox SxS altho the cocking slide setup is somewhat different. Also, from what I can see the Greener bolt actuation is different than the Greener bolt on Fox SBT guns. Whatever..... I agree, a very interesting piece. Thanks Craig for posting. Silvers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 378
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 378 |
Is there a/an "X" on the watertable? My guess it is of the variety of the "Ithaca-Flavored Fox"/Ithaca prototype as found in Volume 8, Issue 2(Summer 1997) page 92 by Tom C. Kidd
Kind Regards,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,941 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,941 Likes: 19 |
What an interesting gun and lots of it is Fox.If it could only talk! Bobby
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 110
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 110 |
Thanks loads for all the comments. I agree it is very Fox-like except for no provision for the rotary bolt, plus the coil sear springs forward of the axle. Anyway, if it's like Dave said, a prototype, that could explain the differences. Raimey, I'll dig out that issue and see if I can make sense of it; BTW, nothing on the water table. Thanks again to everyone for contributing. Craig
Last edited by Craig Libhart; 05/31/10 08:17 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,447 Likes: 278
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,447 Likes: 278 |
Not likely any connection with any European maker. The only Greener style "round sliding" bolt gun without functional underlugs I can think of is the 200E Merkel over under. It seems to be someone's effort to get away from the chore of fitting the rotary bolt. In the late thirties, Remington considered using Fox actions for a "Parker reintroduction" after the Parker operation was shut down. Remington would be hard pressed to pass off a Fox as a Parker if the rotary bolt were present. Remington memos discussing the use of the Fox do exist, but I am not aware of any prototype. I believe that the Lancaster Trigger Company was out of business by the late thirties, but a gun with a Lancaster trigger could have been used as the Parker-Fox prototype, I guess.
Last edited by eightbore; 06/01/10 11:05 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|