S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,503
Posts562,167
Members14,587
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457 Likes: 336
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457 Likes: 336 |
bavarian brit, was that 450 pounds for one barrel ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,867 Likes: 170
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,867 Likes: 170 |
It's an Atkin, very nice wood and from a distance you can hardlly see the wood extension. There may be enough wood to remove it and get a decent LOP with a leather pad, but that I am not sure about. As far as what would I use it for? I would shoot mostly clays and ocasional doves. A friend has the gun and has offered me to take it and shoot it all I want. I just not sure a underlever is what I want. But the gun is georgeous! I was really surprised how easy it was to open and close for an underlever.
Mike Proctor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,475 Likes: 54
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,475 Likes: 54 |
OK, $5K seems high, but if it has gorgeous engraving and fabulous wood and if it fits you after you add the leather pad, what the heck? That stock extension is a bigger deal killer (to me) than properly sleeved barrels. I would think that if you buy this one, you'd better plan to keep it for a long time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 196
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 196 |
One query - is this a Jones underlever or a push forward or thumb hole "underlever"? If a push forward, which I have on my 1870 Reilly hammergun, it is incredibly easy to use and I notice virtually no difference to using a top lever and that is on either clays or live quarry. Although the Jones underlever can take slightly longer, with practice, even this is wholly managable.
A (UK) sleeving job of £450 strikes me as too cheap by far, especially if one wants a quality job done.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815 Likes: 4 |
If it is a Jones Underlever, there is nothing more comfortable than carrying one. Once you are used to it it is nearly as fast and certainly stronger tha the top lever.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 74
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 74 |
IMHO as stated better by others ... here & elsewhere
1) for 5k you can get a lot of gun ... especially older ones however the buyer needs to beware 2) quality of the tube job is the critical...especially with a top shelf gun 3) unless you are a TRUE expert ,having an expert appraisal and mechanical check might be wise 2) if this gun suits YOU and all else is ok buy it
to digress a little only 3 guns I really really regret not buying in 40 + years of playing with guns
a William Evans hammer with Jones under lever still haunts me the price was right, the gun was wonderful but i was broke
if you want to shoot fast and a Jones underlever is too slow might i suggest a Remington 1100 with a magazine extension? ok, that last was supposed to be funny
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 277 Likes: 11
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 277 Likes: 11 |
Daryl. No of course not, they were offering in the advertisement to replace both worn out tubes for that price including reproof. I spoke to the Cheshire guns store in Stockport Lancashire while on my visit also and said that they can do the MIG weld type of replacement also but I do not know what their price would be. The Rigby I left with Mr Merker was replaced using the MIG system and it really is an invisible job apart from the "sleeved" note on the proof area of the bbls. Martin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 986
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 986 |
There are, IMHO, two values to a gun: it's collector value and what it's worth to you. The only question you have to ask yourself is which value is more important to you.
Personally, I don't really care what its collector value is, I'm a shooter first and a collector a very distant second. I collect guns I like and that I can shoot without much care about their value.
I bought a sleeved hammergun and likely paid more than its collector value was worth. However, the gun was in very good condition, it is in my opinion a very elegent and attractive looking gun, it fits me quite well and I can shoot it pretty well too. It was worth it for me as far as I'm concerned. I'll own and shoot this gun for the rest of my life.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
certainly stronger tha the top lever. How does it add strength, it simply holds the bbls shut? When a shotgun action fails it is most often from cracking across the juncture of standing breech & Bar. Neither the Jones nor the "Purdey" double underbolt provides any additional strength to this area whether the later be actuated by a thumb push or top lever.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89 |
Got a chance to buy a real nice hammer gun with real nice wood and new 28" barrels. Heres the deal, it is a underlever, it's sleeved and it has a stock extension. It is a well known maker and in great re-stored shape. My concern is the underlever, I know there is nothing wrong with it but I was always partial to a top or sidelever. I have held the gun and it opens and closes really slick! And did I mention it is a top tier maker and under 5K. So opinions please. Nothing wrong with a good sleeving job...it can make an old useless gun usable again. I'm not sure I'd get that deep in an underlever. People claim they are stronger but the only side x side I've had that shot loose was a Jones underlever.
|
|
|
|
|