Shot Stringing.
I think I know this but decided to spend my coffee break doing the maths based on Burrards data.
Q1 Comparable pellet count differance.
Taking it to an extreme position to exaggerate the effect A stationary target would receive only 5% more pellets that a 30mph traversing target. The results of a " long" shot string vs a "short" shot would be less than one pellet so in order to come up with a mathmatical differance you would need to shoot this " fat duck " about 30 times with each load to get the exact average which you could then express as 0.x pellet. Basically Mr Campbell had it. No differance.
In doing the Math I found out that our average shot string at 30 yds would be about 7' to cover 95% of pellets.It would be travelling at @ 750fps. A poor or elongated shot string might be 33% longer which would allow the target to traverse a further 1&3/4". I wouldn't worry about it if I were you.
Thanks for the excercise tho.
