Originally Posted By: AussieBob
Kilibru
Reproofing the gun runs the risk of having no gun afterwards.


This is probably not a bad thing when compared to losing eyes or fingers from a burst barrel.

Still, I have imagined sending a nice gun to a proof house and not only getting back a blown-up gun, but having paid for it. Kind of like paying the surgeon even if Grandpa doesn't survive the operation... which is exactly what happens.

I think it would make for very interesting reading if someone were to do an article based upon interviews with long-time employees of proof houses. I wonder if they get a feel for which ones are going to let loose based upon make, barrel type, damage (i.e., pitting; external or internal, dents, wall thickness), or any other factors.


Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug