Originally Posted By: Dave K
From the ATF site;
Page 67;

http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps41631/2005/p53004.pdf
"The purchase or other
acquisition of a firearm shall, except as
provided in paragraph (g) of this section,
be recorded not later than the close of the
next business day following the date of
such purchase or acquisition. The record
shall show the date of receipt, the name
and address or the name and license
number of the person from whom received,
the name of the manufacturer and
importer (if any), the model, serial number,
type, and the caliber or gauge of the firearm
"

A DL may be a handy way to do it but it is not required,just name a adress, in transaction Phillip is involved in,especially as a "claw back" requirment after the deal was done.
For a in person sale with a 4473,yes a DL would be the way to do it but for guns recieved through the mail it is not required nor does it offer any protection IMO.If it where me,and I was unlicensed I would just call the guy and see what and why he wants it,perhaps it could be straightend out over the phone when both parties understand what the other wants.


Good stuff, Dave. To get into the logic of the intention, it doesn't matter if the seller is "Jack the Ripper". What matters is that the transferee(the buyer, for folks from Rio Linda) passes the background check. I've met Steve and I know he's a good guy but we can respectfully disagree on this one. I will not deal with an FFL who makes up his own "rules". That said, I DO understand the concern for keeping your license in good standing. For the same reason, I would never ask an FFL holder or seller/buyer to do anything shady or illegal. Following the ACTUAL laws are all anyone needs to do. Sorry to beat this to death but it's one of my favorite topics. Comes up frequently.
Thanks to all,


> Jim Legg <