S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,499
Posts562,117
Members14,587
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 743
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 743 |
Hi guys,
After vegas, I am about to make my first single barrel rifle purchase (other than my unique non-military martini-henry). Money is tight, but I have some put away.
Was thinking about a new 1885 Winchester in .45/70 (I "lost" my 45/70 so I have components for it. Long story.)
I figure it is a starting point. could customize it as $ permit. Can purchase wholesale for $800. An other suggestions.
Jerry
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
Just make sure it has a shotgun style buttplate, not a crescent, which will kick you badly.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,264 Likes: 92
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,264 Likes: 92 |
Just make sure it has a shotgun style buttplate, not a crescent, which will kick you badly. Let me add my voice in chorus to that!! I've had a lot of fun with the Pedersoli Roller and Sharps knockoffs that I picked up pretty cheap used. (Neither one had been shot much) The Creedmore Style Roller was the more accurate of the two and the barrels for both were finished very nicely. I can't begin to imagine how many pounds of lead I put through those two.
Dodging lions and wasting time.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026 |
I like the C.Sharps 1885s, as I have posted--twice the dough but made in USA and twice the choices.
For most people, a .45-70 is overkill at both ends. I agree with the shotgun buttplate choice; the "rifle" style is OK if you only hunt with it (adrenaline is a GREAT anesthetic!) but if you ever intend to shoot targets, DON'T buy a crescent "rifle" butt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 743
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 743 |
Thanks
I was intending on buying a model with a shotgun butt, 24" heavy octagon barrel I love the 45/70 and in a heavy gun I don't think the recoil is excessive at all. I like the 300 grain Barnes at 2100fps (no lead in my part of CA)
I am puzzled a bit by the Hogdon reloading data. One for old trapdoors, one for marlin 1895's and one for "modern" rifles. Which is the correct one for the new 1885's?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 422 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 422 Likes: 1 |
45-70s have been made since 1873 or thereabouts. You can encounter all sorts of designs from weak to strong and can find rifles made out of all sorts of steel. Several writers, experimenters & the major loading manuals place 45-70 rifles into 3 or 4 categories. Cat. 1 rifles are the old ones; Trap Door Springfields, Peabodys, Remington (& other) Rolling Blocks, Side Hammer Sharps, 1881 Marlins, Ballards and the like. Those are OK for black powder & lead bullets or maybe light loads of smokeless. Cat. 2 rifles are a bit stronger. Those are original Sharps-Borchards, 1886 Winchesters, the case-hardened 1885 Winchesters, Remington-Lees, etc. Original 1895 Marlins probably go into this category. You can pour a bit more smokeless into those. Cat. 3 rifles are even stronger. Some writers put original 1885 Winchesters with blued actions into this category, but others disagree. Presumably the new Marlin 1895 rifles are Category 3, as are new made Winchesters, Sharps-Borchardts, etc. If there is a Category 4, it is probably limited to Rugers, converted Siamese Mausers, and the lesser-known single shots similar to Rugers. I guess those are "modern" rifles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
Waterman, although I suppose it has happened, I have never seen, read of or heard of a blown Winchester High Wall in any style frame, thick or thinwall, blued or colored. At the least they all belong in your Category 3.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153 |
I'll go even further than that. Please refer to Dick Simmons' seminal work Custom Built Rifles for a monograph by J.R.Buhmiller on his premeditated attempts at blowing up a high wall.
He didn't succeed.
Buhmiller was an internationally-known barrel maker and African hunter/game control killer. His FIRST-HAND observations and experiments are very interesting reading to say the least. Regards, Joe
You can lead a man to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,429 Likes: 35
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,429 Likes: 35 |
We have a member here who was successful in blowing-up a High Wall, via erroneous Lyman loading data. Do a search.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
Stever, again, the exception proves the rule. But it would be good if he would come forward and tell us the tale.
|
|
|
|
|