Ben Deeble, I am becoming more amused with your arguements. Mr. Harris, Brown, Ryan F. and others asked you for specific science that justifies your view. Your response is calling a Montana position as just "a perfunctory briefing note written by a harried staffer at Montana FWP". Other statements using the term "ignorant hogwash" and avoidance of specific questions asked above give your views, at best, tainted value. Arguements about Grace and trying to relate it to this discussion are rather sophomoric , as stated above.

By the way, what are your qualifications to interpret toxicology reports, and the data you index, but do not elaborate on ? I am wondering about the possibility of pandering to funding sources. I have no funding sources, but what are yours and what are those of organizations you may represent ?

Again, answer the questions asked above, if you will.

http://www.bakercollectors.com/