Originally Posted By: Geno
You see I'd say this the gun made by Fisher & Co now, not by Gibbs. In future this information could be lost and our descendants could trade it as original piece, which is wrong, thou gun looks great.


I agree with you Geno but not in the way that you might think. It seems that Mr. Fisher does not mark much of his work. I believe that he should mark all his work for folks in future generations. IMO a Jerry Fisher stocked Gibbs would be more desirable and valuable than if it were original. It would not surprise me to learn that the owner of the rifle paid more for the stocking than for the rifle. A fine rifle that I would be proud to own, but then I would have had Mr. Fisher put his name on it.

MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014