S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,491
Posts562,020
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,758 Likes: 460
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,758 Likes: 460 |
I missed a chance on a double on pheasants while blocking in a cold wind while in S. Dakota. Was fumbling to extract and reload with gloves on when two cocks flushed together in front of me. Not that big a deal to me, but one is expected to do one's part when blocking and it's easy to pick up the empties after the drivers arrive.
Last edited by revdocdrew; 12/25/06 03:32 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19 |
I gotta admit, the LC ejector system is a PIA on openning, probably others too. None of my modern guns has been a problem at all. I think most modern designers have learned from the past designs and the better designs have nearly unnoticeable cocking.
Sam, My 12g low press. loads use Clays with 1 oz @ 6500 psi. Very clean.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 976
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 976 |
Chuck,
Would you mind sharing your 12G, LP loads?
Jim
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19 |
Jim, This load is basically from "Reloading for Shotgunners" by Kurt Fackler/M.L. McPherson, 4th Edition, pg 161, but a little less charge. Fed Gold Medal Paper hull Fed 12S3 wad 17.5 gr Clays Fed 209A star crimp In my singleshot Iver equipped with a Pressure Trace http://www.shootingsoftware.com/pressure.htm straingage setup and chronograph, I measured about a 6500psi average and about 1150 fps average. You can try the 12S0 wad but I found it was a bit crowded and went with the 12S3. The book above lists a load of 18.0 gr Clays at 1180 fps, but doesn't list the pressure at this charge. They do list a 21 gr load a 1290 fps and 10,900. I recommend you load 5 of these up and send them to the guy that Bell used in his tests, who's name now escapes me. But he tests for $5 a shot. I haven't done this, but have confidence in my test data. You'd be prudent to get a second source of pressure data.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 696
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 696 |
Extractors, because I like their simplicity. When walking up on a dog on point, I have a shell or two between the fingers of my forearm hand (primer end towards the gun), so it takes almost no time to reload, and I don't have to worry about cupping the empties, and I just tuck them in my vest for reloading. If the action is fast and furious (i.e. quail), I grab extra shells from my left vest pocket with my left hand, due to less wasted motion.
Imagination is everything. - Einstein
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 471
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 471 |
In general, I prefer ejectors, but they are not as critical to me as they once were. If I am in a situation where I don't need to reload fast I have learned to catch my ejected shells.
I have a 16 guage Syracuse Arms that has a small lever on the forend to switch the ejectors on or off. I primarily use this gun when I am hunting sharptails and pheasants and in these circumstances I have it set to eject.
Riprap
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,107 Likes: 78
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,107 Likes: 78 |
Ejectors, of course. An ejector gun does everything better, even if you want to pocket empties. Who wants to 'pick out' the damn empties when an ejector gun puts them in your hand? If you're shooting from a blind, just let them fly.
How nice it would be to have enough financial resources to not deal at all with the empties, which is why God invented ejectors. Just open the gun, and they're gone - for good.
"The price of good shotgunnery is constant practice" - Fred Kimble
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,522
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,522 |
I like ejectors, but have both and find no appreciable difference in performance. If I am shooting dove and need to reload quickly I can rake the empties onto the ground at my feet as I reach toward my shell pocket. Pick up the empties later. Some times at skeet a puller might get hit in the legs with an ejected shell accidentally after a repeated inattentive effort on his part, but I would never do that on purpose.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,893 Likes: 651
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,893 Likes: 651 |
Both work well for almost all types of shooting. But why worry aobut the question. If the gun fits you well and you shoot it well you will not care if it has ejectors or extractors. Personal taste just like types of finish, barrel legenth, straight or pistol grip, ect....
From a practical viewpoint you will never hear of an extractor gun going in to have the extractors worked on. The wood also gets very thin in the for end when you get ejectors. Not a big deal in either case to me. But fall and crack an ejector forend and then see how much fun they are to inlet.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 130
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 130 |
I've shot both too. The worst is when the shell hangs in an ejector and you have to pull it out. When the action is fast the daggumed ejector that fouls will cause more loss than an extractor.
|
|
|
|
|