S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
2 members (VintageProf, jlb),
602
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,500
Posts562,119
Members14,587
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465 |
I have thoroughly enjoyed following this thread and learning why you made the decisions you did in restoration. It has been fun to participate. I've also learned about another Classic smith that I didn't even know existed. Thank you.
Also thanks to Rocky Mtn Bill for selling me a high number '03 action for the rifle JD is building. I was beginning to think they had all disappeared.
I love this site.
Jerry Liles
Last edited by WJL; 01/30/09 04:21 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
I guess I see the swell, but it certainly is not very dramatic and it seems to be symmetrical. I thought most palm swell grips were set up for right or left hand Most are, and I suspect that few have seen an original Wundhammer one. Of the fifteen or so Wundhammer rifles I have seen only one had the palm swell and it was just like the one on the Ross. Wundhammer's name is now synonymous with something he would not recognize.
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 604 Likes: 29
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 604 Likes: 29 |
Hi Michael, Cast parts usually have a lot of voids and impurities that can will show up after anodizing. Just depends on the quality of the casting.
The heavy and long barrel, and the slow twist, makes me think that this rifles was intended to be shot at targets more than it was game. For this application, I don't think the buttplate that is on it is that inappropriate. Of course, thats just me.
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
John,
Thanks I'll live with it for a while before I do anything with the buttplate. I may go the anodizing route at a later date.
Terry,
I can't find pictures of the high-wall Pope, do you know who made the stock on it? Could it have been Ross King? Might be hard to tell if it's a heavy target stock.
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
Another Pope sporter owned by a friend. S.R. Griffin stock, Pope barrel, Kornbrath engraving, caliber 30-06.  
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
I think this is one also, the owner can tell you about it. 
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 625
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 625 |
On the Pope .405-.30 highwall, I have no idea about the stock maker. We did not photograph it as the butt plate was off, and we had other (at the time more interesting) things to do. I'll send you a snap shot this week end. It is a target style stock - which reminds me of a thought which may not really belong in this thread. Since your bench rest shooting indicates equal or better groups when the front rest is directly on the barrel rather than the fore end, could/should not some of these long "2 x 4" fore ends on older target rifles be cut to more pleasing profiles?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
Mr. Murphy's other Pope rifle.  
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
And yet another one, I may have to do an article on custom sporters with Pope barrels. 
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 155
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 155 |
Boy, I would absolutely replace the forend on the Murphy Pope High Wall. Original or not, that big club spoils what would otherwise be a simple attractive rifle with an excellent pedigree. Since the wood does not seem to really match anyway, at least from the photo, cutting down the original is probably not worth the effort. Keep the original for the historical value, and have something made which looks right on the rifle.
|
|
|
|
|