I did not anticipate leaving the notion that only certain classes of people have rights in Canada.
Just taking you at your word, King. If stockholders have no rights, well, then only certain classes of people have rights.
It would be against the law to fire a pro-choice employee of a condom manufactur if that person campaigned publicly against abortion or picketed with placards at the company gate. I said in my first post that I didn't know how it works in the United States. This is how it works in Canada.
I think you're flying a kite here, King. An employee running a machine making condoms and a corporate president with a clear fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders are clean different things.
The dollar has nothing to do with it. Should the pro-choice evangelical's activities affect the condom manufacturer's bottom-line, that's a price of freedom of dissent. Nothing's stopping the manufacturer from his right to have his say with five-colour ads or airtime. He can't deprive employees of their livlihood.
That's absurd. Of course they can. With rank and file employees, they can lay-off when it becomes clear that business is going to decline. With corporate officers, they can make key management changes to increase profitability.
