Jim, I guess the answer depends on the country we're living in. A company would need deep pockets to violate a constitutional right in Canada. Rights and freedoms trump shareholder dividends. Otherwise money becomes the arbiter of morality. Everyone here, with or without testicles, would not accept it.
King:
There were two possible ways to "answer" the question I raised in my last post:
1: Ignore the question
2: Go off on a tangent
You obviously have taken the latter route and are avoiding the question by going off on a tangent. I can't speak to your Canadian "Rights and Freedoms" but I can tell you that here if you are an employee of a company and you commit an act deemed not in the best interest of your employer you will be dealt with in any way the Company sees fit. A traitorous act is a traitorous act period.
A company can't act to protect their own best interests? Now that's a bizarre concept I've not heard before. Again Answer the question I raised Yes or No.
