To the honorable members of this board
At the age of 62 I have developed a rabid pasion for doubles. Thus I ask this question: If a double swings better than a non-double, why the insurgence of shorter bbls on doubles?
It would seem they would swing much smoother with longer bbls.
After all the bbls between the hands decreases the advantage of having more weight out front providing less chance of stopping or slowing your swing.
By my reasoning (I never claimed to be intelligent), it seems contradictery that doubles are sporting shorter bbls, and non doubles, partculary non-double, target guns, (with the added length of the receiver between the hands) seem to be heading the route of the "long toms".
Hoping you guys can clear my muddled thinking.
Mike B.
