I vote for the last models of the "Fox" BSE. They took a clunky but reliable design that worked OK. Added a bunch of stuff that no one really needs (non-selective single trigger, often non-functioning ejectors, usually ill-fitted ventilated rib). Finished it with stamped "checkering" that looks lousy and doesn't do what checkering is supposed to do, and "bowling ball" finish on an over-wooded stock with bulbous forend, and kindergarten-style roll "engraving". Did I forget the plastic white-lined buttplate and pistol grip cap? The 30" 12 guage is just a monster to carry and swing. The 26" .410 is just a monster (and you can get one for about $1000 on any auction site....). Extra ugly points if you get one of the ones with a "silver" reciever.
Take an early Model B and put it next to a late BSE and you will see much of what is wrong with our "consumer society" (Putting a BSE next to a real Fox will simply break your heart....DON'T do it.). Bill Ruger, for example, had his own visions--he often DIDN'T "listen to the consumer." That's why we often talk about the #1 and the GL (even those of us that hate them)--this may be the last discussion EVER of the "Fox" BSE.
I would take the worst Win Model 24 in the world over any BSE; the 24 is at least "interesting" and an honest effort to use new technology to make a cheap, usable gun! ("Let's see, we got this auto components factory and we're really a gunmaker...does "form REALLY follow function?"). Mention the 24 and you get a ****storm of opinions. Mention a BSE and you get ZZZZZZZZZZ.
Just MY (not-particularly-humble) opinion.
