"there is also that top friction coat consisting of deceit."
"BSUBA's comments on non-tox prices are not true either.... Maybe steel.... But safe non-tox for our old guns still pales lead!"
"Anyone that would make that statement deserves to have to pay through the nose to shoot nice shot or tungsten matrix. Just because a small percentage of hunters don't have better ways to waste money than $18-$20 boxes of lead doesn't justify a reason for 99% of hunters to spend on 2-3 shells what they currently spend for a box of 25."
"I'd appreciate seeing BSUBA's analysis of the price comparability between lead shot loads and the various non-tox's currently available. To my knowledge, the only thing remotely close to lead shell prices is that of 'steel' shot with its limitations for older guns. A breakdown of this would be beneficial to the discussion, I think."
"Which, again, means that a whole lot of shotguns, still in regular use, would either become wallhangers, or their owners would be shooting those $2 apiece nontox alternatives."
"those "$2 apiece" non-tox shells are rapidly becoming "$4 apiece," especially when you factor in sales tax and shipping."
Grouse Guy,
I'm not the youngest poster here..... So I was wondering if you are
EVER going to address this BSUBA comment:
"Recent increases in the cost of lead shot are making many non-toxic shot products comparably priced to premium lead game loads."
Several quotes are listed above from several different individuals questioning this....
My thoughts with you as a BSUBA representative are that you should! This would be good.....
To me, your mind seems made up on this subject and this is bad....
doubleornothin
