Several weeks ago I started a thread about a, 1890-made Husqvarna hammer double I recently acquired that is off-face. In the many useful responses are a few mentions of "off bolt". One post includes a nice picture of a double with shims around each underlug (bolt?), with implication that a gun that is off-face has gotten that way by battering where each underlug rests against the frame, as well as where the hook meets the hinge pin.
As I have cleaned more and more crud from the gun and analysed situation for this particular gun I clearly see that gaps of about 0,005 inches have been created between underlugs and frame and between hook and hinge pin. I also do not see how underlugs could be battered without hinge pin and hook also being battered, and vice versa.
It seems that sliding bolts that lock underlugs down, locking gun closes, are engaging nicely, with no visible wear (at least not to me, at my present level of understanding).
I have now shot this gun twice, once with thin tape on hook and once with thin Al shim on hook. The thin tape barely lasted 25 shots. The Al shim lasted 3 rounds of trap and looks good for more. Gun shoots well, but further test shooting is planned.
QUESTIONS:
1) Am I correct in my analysis of battering on underlugs and hinge pin?
2) When folks talk about putting gun back on-face, are they really talking about repairs to both hinge pin and underlugs?
3) Gluing of metal shims to hooks was discussed and cussed at some length. Is this likely to be a useful temporary fix for underlugs as well?
4) Some posters quoted minimum costs for putting gun back on face. Does/should this include building up of both underlugs and hinge pin or hook?
5) Does this degree of battering on both hinge pin/hook and underlugs suggest anything else I should look for? With 0,005 shim on hooks there is now no light seen between end of barrels and breech face.
Thanks,
Niklas
Last edited by NiklasP; 01/28/08 03:14 PM.