| | 
| 
 
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |  
|  |  |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |  
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |  
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |  
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |  | 
 |  
| 
	
 
| 3 members (Argo44, Researcher, 1 invisible),
407
guests, and 
9
robots. |  
| 
	Key:
	Admin,
	Global Mod,
	Mod
 | 
 |  
| 
 
| Forums10 Topics39,555 Posts562,699 Members14,593 |  | Most Online9,918Jul 28th, 2025
 | 
 | 
 
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2020 Posts: 1,203 Likes: 552 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Dec 2020 Posts: 1,203 Likes: 552 | 
15” from the breech is pretty close to where your front hand would be if the repair fails. |  
| 1 member likes this:
Ted Schefelbein |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2006 Posts: 3,248 Likes: 424 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Jun 2006 Posts: 3,248 Likes: 424 | 
That looks like it already blew out once, and somebody hammered it back down flat.
 Myself, I think the split could be welded successfully. But the other damage I don’t think so.
 
 A good weld on that tube would be stronger than the tube, but again, it looks like it already blew out once, and then somebody hammered it down flat
 
 Out there doing it best I can.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Oct 2007 Posts: 528 Likes: 15 Sidelock |  
| OP   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Oct 2007 Posts: 528 Likes: 15 | 
When I first saw the crack I thought there had been a bulge at that point in the barrel, but there is no sign that a bulge was ever present. No ring is observed when looking through the bore. There is a dent that has been mostly pushed back out with the crack running through it. When I get time I will measure the wall thickness at and around the damaged area. If the wall thickness is thinner near the crack then a repair will not be attempted.   Thanks for the replies. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  May 2010 Posts: 1,545 Likes: 106 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  May 2010 Posts: 1,545 Likes: 106 | 
Ask yourself how much you value your fingers ? There looks to be much larger area of concern than just the crack . In times past people have  soldered patches over damage like this and that in MHO would be better than welding even with modern welding techniques . Others may disagree but want you do is your decision and risk . |  
| 1 member likes this:
Ted Schefelbein |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jun 2006 Posts: 3,248 Likes: 424 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Jun 2006 Posts: 3,248 Likes: 424 | 
Weld it and proof it a few times.Thank about it, there were literally  children working with their fathers to hammer weld laminate barrels over charcoal forges, and they created works of art.
 
 You can weld the tube.  But! To reiterate, just looking at the pictures, there was damage there, and seemingly a blow out.
 It’s probably struck tissue thin there in an effort to repair the original dent/bulge, and then it split shortly after.
 
 Get measuring.  See it you can have it UT tested as well.
 
 My guess would be that they over honed/struck out the original repair.
 
 Edited to add:
 Which is a shame.
 Bulges never seem to be repairable.
 
Last edited by ClapperZapper; 09/22/25 06:57 AM. Reason: Spelling, and remarks
 
 Out there doing it best I can.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2002 Posts: 1,594 Likes: 101 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Jan 2002 Posts: 1,594 Likes: 101 | 
How thick is it and why did it split? |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Dec 2001 Posts: 6,466 Likes: 345 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Dec 2001 Posts: 6,466 Likes: 345 | 
Is there a crack perpendicular to the linear one , near the middle of the linear one? |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Jan 2006 Posts: 9,772 Likes: 467 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Jan 2006 Posts: 9,772 Likes: 467 | 
I believe the perpendicular defect is the original crease/dent ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Barrel-Evaluations/Barrel-Evaluation/i-G4KLnQX/0/KbrCQQHj4nhp5gRqgCbCBmVDDfwDftm8M3mBcNBBv/S/Lefever%20DS%20crack-S.jpg) I've done an analysis of a c. 1912 Lefever Arms Co. DS “Dura Nitro Steel” and it was non-standard AISI 1035 with a measured tensile strength of 91,500 psi. Comparable to most of the c. 19teens - 30s U.S. double's fluid steel barrels. This is a Model 12 Winchester Proof Steel barrel with a similar split; hard to tell from the pic but it also was probably where a dent was raised ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Barrel-Evaluations/Barrel-Evaluation/i-3GMkBrK/0/KPpq42NJvN758WqGVKVr7CZTL838R6nG5CdZ768qm/M/M12%20proof%20steel%20crack-M.jpg)  Pressures at 15" with today's fast burning shotgun powders are about 1000 psi   ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Shotshells-and-pressures/Pressure-data/i-X8Svkzc/0/NCC6BxRmMGmR7VmrvgRbrjwHqZm8LQBkGSKcMjqRk/S/S%26P%2053%20Distance-S.jpg)  Please let us know the wall thickness at that location |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  |  
| 
Joined:  Feb 2004 Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19 Sidelock |  
|   Sidelock 
 Joined:  Feb 2004 Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19 | 
If the wall thickness is .020" and it is subjected to 1000 psi internal barrel pressure, it will have a hoop stress of approximately 18,000 psi.  Since 1035 has a yield strength of ~40-50k psi,  this is over 2:1 safety factor.  So, welding it with a mild steel rod and striking it down to .020" should be more than adequate.  Although a matching alloy could be used, my experience is that a lower carbon steel rod helps prevent a concentration of excess carbon and cracking along the edge of the weld.  I have made copper plugs that fit the bore well, then TIG welded barrels successfully. 
 I recall Dr Oscar Gaddy shared with me that he had successfully TIG welded a damascus barrel at one time.
 
 From what I see there in the picture, I would investigate further to determine if those are small cracks running radially.  If so, I'd weld those, possibly in a radial weld bead.
 
Last edited by Chuck H; 09/22/25 11:36 AM.
 |  
| 2 members like this:
Stanton Hillis, Drew Hause |  |  |  
 | 
 |