|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,189
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,519
Posts562,332
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 27 Likes: 21
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 27 Likes: 21 |
Last edited by Cold1; 12/10/23 12:07 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 203 Likes: 78
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 203 Likes: 78 |
Cold1, I’m not good at interpreting proof marks, but several on this forum are and expect they’ll chime in soon with help. Looks like neat firearm. Please share a photo of it assembled when you can. Would love to see the whole gun.
Larry
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,096 Likes: 380
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,096 Likes: 380 |
Interesting stamps - yes, mid 18902 to 1912. They paid an extra fee to have the shot tubes pass the voluntary scattergun proof. ![[Linked Image from thumbs2.imgbox.com]](https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/a6/24/3ZphlnZo_t.jpg) Interesting encircled P or something?? Serbus, Raimey rse
|
1 member likes this:
Cold1 |
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,942 Likes: 344
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,942 Likes: 344 |
Between 1893, when the 1891 Proof law came into force and 1912, when the 1911 improvements to the law changed from designating bore diameter from gauge measurement (in your case 118/35) to metric. Mike
|
1 member likes this:
Cold1 |
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,096 Likes: 380
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,096 Likes: 380 |
Ford, I do not think that voluntarily scattergun proof came along till after 1893, or was an addendum.
Serbus,
Raimey rse
|
1 member likes this:
Cold1 |
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 27 Likes: 21
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 27 Likes: 21 |
Thanks guys for the info. Its a little bit older than what I thought it was. I will get some more pictures of the proofs, now that its rebuled they might show in the photos a little better.
I still have a little work to do in the triggers, the rifle sometimes doesn't want to fire. Its a blitz action and its built like clockwork inside it.
I really like this old gun, when I got it refinished I used it on my first and only Quail hunt. That was the first of November. The gun did its part, now I have to learn how to do mine.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,942 Likes: 344
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,942 Likes: 344 |
Raimey, My estimate of between 1893 and 1912 fits with that period. Cold1, Old 9.3x72R ammo was made with .254" M72 Berdan primers that did not require as much firing pin impact to ignite as modern primers do. You might want to load your own ammo with large pistol standard force primers, seated below flush because they are not as thick as rifle primers. If this doesn't work or you don't want to handload, you might need to have a stronger striker spring installed. This was a pretty common problem with older drillings. Mike
|
1 member likes this:
Cold1 |
|
|
|
|
|