|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,843
Posts566,408
Members14,625
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2 |
Hello,
I'm new to this forum and vintage doubles.
I'm looking at a Beesley 12 gauge ejector sidelock. Overall it's in nice shape except for one thing, there's a deep gouge close to the muzzle and what looks like a crack or two several inches from the muzzle. The cracks and gouge are perpendicular to the bore (they go around the bore). The cracks aren't very big, maybe 1/6 the circumference of the bore; the gouge may be 3/8" long. Also, one of the cracks is by the ribs (partially between the upper and lower). The cracks are far enough down the bore where I can’t get a good eye on them (maybe they aren't really cracks?). The gouge I can clearly see. The rest of the bores look fine.
It’s originally a London proof, and then reproofed in Birmingham in 1984. Proof is .729, measured .729 for both. There are .023 & .025.
I can't see any dings, dents, or bulges on the barrels. They also look like they were blackened recently.
Serial is mid-1900's, putting it I believe in the 1910's year. Barrels are steel (not Damascus).
Is this an issue? Could it be a problem in the future? Maybe just machine marks if the chokes were opened up? I know that the pressure gets pretty low out that far.
I'm thinking of getting an endoscope to take a better look.
Your thoughts are appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,407 Likes: 723
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,407 Likes: 723 |
Sounds like tool marks from a poor quality choke job. If that is the case they can likely be polished out fine along as the cutting was done concentric to the bore.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,547 Likes: 111
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,547 Likes: 111 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 15
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 15 |
The two gents above are well known for knowing! I don't propose to add anything to their opinions. From a slightly differing point of view, I'd suggest you get the barrels in the hands of one of the above or someone with similar knowledge. IF the notorious "something" should go wrong, it could be expensive and could alter drastically the resale value of the gun, even after a proper repair.
DDA
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 28
Boxlock
|
Boxlock
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 28 |
The 19XX serial numbers began in late 1904 and ended in 1907 more or less. If you PM me the serial number I can look your sidelock up in the Beesley Ledger for you so you can have some provenance and perhaps some commentary. I have an article deadline right now but I will get to it.
Last edited by Niemann; 02/03/21 04:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,199 Likes: 77
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,199 Likes: 77 |
Is the ".023 & .025" wall thickness or choke constriction?
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income. - Errol Flynn
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,971 Likes: 105
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,971 Likes: 105 |
Is the crack visible on the outside of the barrel or on the inside of the bore?
I have a crack on an early English damascus gun about 10" from the breech that might be 1/16" long, near the rib and runs vertically on the outside of the barrel. I've about decided it's not a crack all the way through but a small welding defect. Pretty well disregard it. But I shoot very low pressured loads-less than 6,500 psi in all my guns so pressures at that location are pretty low. Yours near the muzzle would be a non event unless it goes all the way through into the bore. Even in that case the danger would be minimal (IMO).
John McCain is my war hero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|