|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,519
Posts562,292
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67 |
Lefever experts, Just wondering if Lefever chambered 10 gauge at 2 5/8"? Saw one at a local gun show and my gauge only went in to 2 5/8". Is this normal?
Matt aka Iowa_303
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
I believe that Lefever like most quality gun-makers of that era would chamber a gun to any length desired. Many early 10 gauge guns of the era were made comparatively light weight for use as field guns. I have little doubt that many of these were chambered for the 2 5/8" shell, which was a standard chambering. On the other hand my only 10 gauge Lefever is a 10 lb early gun, no doubt made for waterfowl use & it has 3" chambers. Never to my knowledge a "Standard" chambering, though shells could be special ordered in this length up until around WWI.
Another thing to be aware of is chambers were not as standardized in those days as today & many will run a few thousandths of an inch undersize. As chambers have .04"-.005" taper per inch one can readily see if a chamber is just .001" smaller than the gauge then it will read 1/4" short.
The Lefever you looked at could very well have been chambered for 2 5/8" shells or it could just as well have had a 2 7/8" chamber which was just a bit undersize.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67 |
Thanks Miller. I didn't go any further with checking out this gun after the initial once over and bore/chamber check. Damascus barrels that had been hot blued, ball and socket that was out of adjustment which causes the barrels to rattle on the frame. Guy thought it was made of gold because of its age and "high" condition. Oh well.
Matt aka Iowa_303
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,455 Likes: 278
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,455 Likes: 278 |
Don't ever be concerned about a Lefever that rocks on the hinge. A turn of the "ball" that can't even be measured will tighten it up. Most Lefevers have never had their balls tightened.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67 |
Lefevers "Compensated" action is truly a marvelous invention!
Matt aka Iowa_303
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 368 Likes: 38
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 368 Likes: 38 |
I recently removed the ball screw (knuckle?) from a 20g Lefever. The thread pitch on it is 22 so then if you turn the ball 1/16th of a turn in...think N to NNE...that tightens up just under .003".
Last edited by SamW; 03/04/18 03:45 PM.
Sam Welch
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67 |
Well I went back and took a 2nd look. G grade, chambers are indeed 2 7/8". The dealer who had it had several tables of synthetic stocked rifles and pistols. This was hiding in the middle of a rack of rifles I explained the "difficulties" this old gun has such as short obsolete chambers, Damascus barrels and looseness in the lock up. Walked out with it for $100
Matt aka Iowa_303
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,724 Likes: 128
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,724 Likes: 128 |
Good buy Matt. The Super 10 2 7/8 loads are available commercially from RST if you don't reload. Enjoy your new gun...Geo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 67 |
Thanks George! I do reload for 10, 12 and 16 gauge. This is my second short 10. Also have a 1894 Remmy. I haven't had a Lefever in more than 20 years so its nice to get one again.
Matt aka Iowa_303
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
I believe thye G grade was not introduced until the two hook guns were put on the market in 1890. I would suspect that most of the 2 5/8" chambers preceded that.
When you say "Looseness in the Lockup" are you speaking of bolting or the hinge. If in the bolting the wedge shape of the bolt is to compensate for this wear with the top lever going left. If the lever is all the way left & it is still loose in the bolting it will need a new bolt made.
"Do Not" try to compensate for bolt wear with the ball joint, it is strictly for compensating for hinge wear.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
|
|