|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
3 members (Hammergun, arrieta2, 1 invisible),
838
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,520
Posts562,373
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 150
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 150 |
I plan to start doing some reloading. My motivation for reloading is to be able to make some low pressure and 2 1/2" loads. I will be using a MEC 600 and MEC 650. Can anyone suggest a decent scale(s) to use? I mention scales because some of the reading I have done mention using bot a beam and digital scale. Thanks in advance for any advice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,854 Likes: 118
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,854 Likes: 118 |
You should always use a scale, I happen to use both, a beam and a digital. My digital is a Cabela's 1500 and is I believe a Lyman 1500. The quick readings of the digital are nice and I compare it to the beam. The only I see is that the digital will not always come back to 0.00 in grs. Sometimes it will be 0.01 or 0.02 and I have to tare it again. Don't know why that happens.
David
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 753
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 753 |
i have two different brand beam scales - a LEE and and an RCBS - both work fine for powder - the RCBS will handle a little over an ounce for shot (1.17 oz top limit)
a wider range digital might work better for bigger shot loads
i check the bushings to make sure they throw an accurate charge/load to start - checking several samples before actual loading
then a couple times now and then
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,893 Likes: 651
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,893 Likes: 651 |
Balance beam scales work very well. But they must be level and not in a strong breeze. They are sensitive. The electronic scales work well but I still use both. 50 years of watching a bouncing beam is a hard habit to break.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 928 Likes: 42
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 928 Likes: 42 |
Double post. Sorry!
Last edited by ithaca1; 06/03/15 08:21 PM.
Bill Johnson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 928 Likes: 42
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 928 Likes: 42 |
I use my RCBS chargemaster. Throws powder great. Never tried it for shot though.
Last edited by ithaca1; 06/03/15 03:57 PM.
Bill Johnson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 911 Likes: 45
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 911 Likes: 45 |
Ballistic Products carries a digital scale that comes with weights to calibrate. I've only used it a time or two but was very pleased. Of course I've had an RCBS balance beam for 40 years. The digital is less expensive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,971 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,971 Likes: 103 |
I have both balance beam and digital. The digital has ended up in a closet, not that it's not accurate but I just never could come to trust it completely. A balance beam, though old technology, is just about fail proof--gravity never changes. And it seems previous responders have similar hesitations, keeping both handy.
John McCain is my war hero.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 476 Likes: 76
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 476 Likes: 76 |
A balance beam, though old technology, is just about fail proof--gravity never changes I've been using the same Ohaus 5-0-5 for 42 years (yes, it is actually labeled Ohaus). It's been dead nuts reliable year after year after year. I have no plans to ever go digital - I suspect that balance beams cost more because better usually does cost more.
Last edited by FlyChamps; 06/03/15 07:32 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961 Likes: 9 |
Use a scale, MEC bushings and bars can NOT be trusted to throw the weight they say they will.
bill
|
|
|
|
|
|