|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
2 members (2 invisible),
661
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,502
Posts562,138
Members14,587
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,971 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,971 Likes: 103 |
Definitely larger shot. I'd rather have one penetrate into the vitals than half dozen embedding in the flesh. I also have settled on #7 for anything small enough to put into my game vest.
John McCain is my war hero.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,228 Likes: 60
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,228 Likes: 60 |
After many years of pheasant hunting, I use No 5 shot primarily for them. I have 12ga loads of 1 to 1-1/4 ounce depending on the situation. One ounce is fine for most pen raised birds. Large shot kills better and most often passes through the bird for no pellets in the meat. I also have a few No 4s in my vest if the ranges get longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89 |
In my opinion, there is no game bird that should be shot with #10 shot. Believe it or not there are a few idiots out there shooting wild turkeys with #9 sized shot....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,234
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,234 |
I've shot railbirds with #10 shot and it worked really well. But the shots are mostly very close, and it's kind of a traditional thing to use very small shot on them anyway. I don't know as I'd shoot it at anything else really, unless maybe it was awful small and awful close and my choke was real open......
Out there at the crossroads molding the devil's bullets. - Tom Waits
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89 |
I can't see your reply because I'm ignoring you...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572 Likes: 165 |
If you read some of the classic literature on woodcock hunting--John Alden Knight's book "Woodcock", for example--you'll find that 10's were once apparently fairly popular as woodcock loads. Not sure why, based on my experience. But some people, back "in the day", must have had better luck with them than I did.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,448 Likes: 278
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,448 Likes: 278 |
Way more birds, shot at short distances.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,609 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,609 Likes: 14 |
Way more birds, shot at short distances. And a lot less concern over ingesting lead at the dinner table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
