|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,492
Posts562,051
Members14,585
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 38
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 38 |
I am a little thrown by what I'm seeing and reading. The ad does not actually say these are made by Holland & Holland, yet lists the manufacturer as Holland & Holland. Did they make a gun marked H&H like these? The letters confuse me too - it makes it look like the model of the guns is "shot and regulated". And if not, how does one regulate a shotgun after its made? I do not have enough experience to know what I am actually looking at here.... thank you. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=338303142
Prof. P. Terry Plegia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,337 Likes: 340
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,337 Likes: 340 |
Hi, the guns your looking at are BLE's made in Birmingham for H&H. H&H BLE's were made by either S. Wright & Son or A.A. Brown and later by Webley & Scott (these appear to be Scott made guns, no fancy backs and also have just the H&H mark and not Holland & Holland on the action). The shot and regulated means that H&H would do the choke work and regulate the patterning at their shooting grounds before finishing (blackening the bbls) the guns at their shop. So while these guns are marketed by and marked H&H they were not made by H&H in London.
H&H also marketed a fancier/higher finished model the Cavalier and the Northwoods (more plain than the Cavaliers)
BTW, what "numbers" are you referring too?
Best!
Greg
Gregory J. Westberg MSG, USA Ret
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 142
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 142 |
Holland and Holland acquired W&C Scott in 1985. Scott made these guns and H&H marketed them as "shot & regulated" by H&H.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,768 Likes: 115
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,768 Likes: 115 |
The code shows they were made in 1973. I suspect that they were proofed but unfinished guns that Hollands had when they took over the stock of Webley & Scott. They would have then finished them. Basically they are a pair of Webley 700's but may fetch a slight premium with the Holland & Holland conection. Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,543 Likes: 102
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,543 Likes: 102 |
The guns were built by Webley and Scott in Te 70's for Hollands . They were actually Webley 700's and left the factory in the finished state . The"shot and regulated" is just a marketing ploy as the only work Hollands wwe likely to have done was to bore the chokes if they were stock guns ,guns to order would have been sent out with chokes bored . It was a way of selling a cheap gun that bore the Holland marque without actually claiming to have made them . There is a law in the UK that came in around that time that prevents companies claiming that they have made an item unless they actually did a percentage of the work themselves . This is seen in other guns made by Webley that although bearing a makers name will have on the barrel something like specially made for ,or made to the requirements of XXXXX .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 38
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 38 |
Thanks for all the info. They looked a little...I don't know...garish? to be actual Holland and Holland made guns...
Prof. P. Terry Plegia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,893 Likes: 651
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,893 Likes: 651 |
So how much mystique does the handling and perhaps minor choke work by a H & H employee make these gun worth more than a standard 700? Not one extra penny to me. Buy the gun not the name is never more to the point than for guns like this. Now what I see is a true pair of 700 made in a period of less than stellar workmanship for many guns of that era. I would examine them with a critical eye and not pay extra for a little poorly engraved letters on the rib or side. They are what they are and are not a rare gun in mint condition, just a pair of closet queens with too much makeup.
|
|
|
|
|
|