I was one of the participants in the discussion on the other website. Stevens apparently made 10 of these No.600 rifles in 1910, in an attempt to enter the British market. To me, the question is (1) Is this a "real" Stevens, made in the US with an imported, probably BSA, action? Or (2) is this a rifle made in England (as a result of a contract with Stevens) & fitted with an imported Stevens barrel? Again, to me, if it is a "real" Stevens, then it has a substantial collector value. If it is another early British Martini smallbore rifle but with a Stevens barrel, it loses a great deal of appeal. But 1050 is a steal in either case.
What would the early US smallbore target rifle market have been like had Stevens decided to market the No.600 (as an American-made rifle, sold without the tariff added to the price) instead of or in addition to the 404 (rather rare) and the 414 (relatively common)? Would Stevens have held a large share of the market during the 1920s? Would Winchester have brought out the 52 in 1919?
Last edited by waterman; 09/12/09 01:55 AM.