You know, Miller. I think I spoke too hastily in using the term "scientific fact". I have read Rocketman relate it so many times over the last 13 years on here, that I had come to accept that it is scientific fact. I cannot prove it with data, but when he explains it, with his lifetime engineering background, it makes so much sense that I accept it, too.
My apology to cpa and to the board for calling something fact that I cannot back up with data. That data may well exist, but I cannot put my hands on it.
Just for funsies, type "venturi" into the search engine on this forum and read all the times Don (Rocketman) has explained the principle, and how it applies. BTW, thanks for holding my feet to the fire on it.
Would you, in turn, please cite the data that disagrees with my (and Don's) belief of how a shot charge acts when encountering a forcing cone or choke cone (venturi)? I would seriously like to read it. Thanks in advance.
SRH
