claycrusher, if you are seriously interested in the ongoing lead ammunition dispute, there is a veritable ton of information on both sides of the debate. Here is just one little link that will take you to a page with over 40 other links to research papers and studies that refute much of the anti-lead propaganda that passes as science which is routinely used against shooters and hunters. This is not for Larry. He's too entrenched in trying to discredit anyone who disagrees with him.
http://www.huntfortruth.org/science/scientific-opinions/papersstudies/You can also do searches on any search engine to find enough reading to keep you busy for months or years. Many of the anti-lead arguments you'll also find are pretty persuasive until you actually use your brain and your other senses to see through conflicting data, unverified opinions passed off as real science, and pure agenda driven Bullshit. In many instances, as with the situation involving the aforementioned North Dakota study by Dr. William Comatzer of the Peregrine Fund, you have to follow the money or do some sleuthing to see what their actual motivations or affiliations are.
Nice to see you are an NRA Patron Life Member. The NRA has been at the forefront in this battle for years, and they are another good source for information on the subject. An NRA membership is the best and cheapest gun insurance any gun owner can buy and membership also gives you $2500 of Firearms Insurance as just one of the member benefits. You also get a magazine subscription that has a lot of information you won't find in other news sources. There is currently a $10.00 discount to join for annual memberships, and in the current political climate and an election year, a lot of new members will send a loud and clear message. Not bad for only $25.00 a year.
https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp?CampaignID=XR020795 
