Figured you couldn't come up with anything new on the "junk science" that supported the lead ban for waterfowl. More bluff and blather.
Where did I make any comment at all on the validity of the study that found lead fragments in ground venison? You keep missing the point. That study, flawed or not, resulted in another study: By the CDC, of the blood lead level of North Dakota residents. And the CDC study is very GOOD news for those who want to continue shooting lead, because it showed that the average blood lead level of everyone in that ND study was lower than the national average--which would indicate that ingesting lead from wild game isn't much of an issue as far as human health is concerned. The National Shooting Sports Foundation made the following statement in a press release, concerning the ND CDC study:
"The CDC report on human lead levels of hunters in North Dakota has confirmed what hunters throughout the world have known for hundreds of years, that traditional ammunition poses no health risk to people and that the call to ban lead ammunition was nothing more than a scare tactic being pursued by anti-hunting groups."
Once more: Lead poisoning isn't the subject of this thread. Start a new one . . . if you have anything new or worthwhile to contribute.
Last edited by L. Brown; 02/27/16 08:13 AM.
