Members will note the little fella's continual twisting. Neither Replacement or I piled on Jim. Quite the opposite. Replacement, reporting accurately Jim's latter posts, asked me if the good man I had described is the same Jim. I replied in the affirmative, said he wasn't always that way. He is an honest, reasonable man whose irrational posts appeared to be from stress; he'd rest a while and be back. As for Jim being banned, I referenced the responsibility of all of us to keep the personal out of it, including Dave as administrator, and said we don't know whether Jim left voluntarily or not. Jim's departure was rational and commendable under the circumstances.