LD, I'm far more likely to use my "keystrokes" to fight it in print, as in magazines read by thousands of bird hunters. But I don't believe in drooling at the mouth, or on the keyboard. I believe in presenting whatever "good science" there is to support such a ban (I have yet to see much, where upland birds are concerned) and counter it with pro-lead arguments. In other words, a balanced presentation rather than "the steel shot proponents are enviro-Nazis". I think steel loses on facts; no need to rely on emotion.