S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,496
Posts545,386
Members14,410
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4 |
Recently aquired an older 12 ga. smith..my info. indicates it was made sometime in 1911 (serial# 38xx). The barrels say "armor steel" underneath. Am wondering if modern loads are OK in this gun? Also, would this year of manufactor tell chamber length.. and if not is there a way for me to tell if I have 2.5 0r 2.75 inch chambers? Thanks for any advice. Matt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,257
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,257 |
Hello and welcome to the BBS. NO. Modern American Nitro loads(average pressures well above 11,000PSI ) are too pressure heavy for this gun. The pressures you must look to shoot are 9000 PSI and below. Closer to 7000 would be better on both the metal and especially the wood. Many things may have been done to the gun since it left the factory. Take it to a good SxS smith and have it checked out. He will measure everything and then there will be no doubt. Many companies sell CIP (European standard pressure) shells, so unless you reload there is plenty of shells for this gun. If you treat it right, you will have a shooter for life. Best, John PS---Remember that low brass has nothing to do with the pressure generated by the fired shell.
Humble member of the League of Extraodinary Gentlemen (LEG). Joined 14 March, 2006. Member #1.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,468
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,468 |
probably 2 9/16". It can be lengthened
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,257
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,257 |
Pete: Don't you agree that lengthening the chamber is really not necessary? Best, John
Humble member of the League of Extraodinary Gentlemen (LEG). Joined 14 March, 2006. Member #1.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4 |
What are the potential problems of not lengthening chambers?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,257
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,257 |
sonny243: There are no problems. It is perfectly alright to shoot 2 3/4 inch shells in your gun if the barrels are sound. Leave the chambers as they are and have a ball. Best, John
Humble member of the League of Extraodinary Gentlemen (LEG). Joined 14 March, 2006. Member #1.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 477
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 477 |
I believe most Smiths are 2 3/4". I have a 1905 with them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1 |
According to the Hunter Arms catalogs all 12ga LCs are 2 3/4 except for the 3" guns which are marked. WARNING 20GA, 16GA AND 410 MAY BE SHORT CHAMBERS!! It is best to check the chambers and have the wall thickness checked on guns you are unsure of, best to be safe than sorry.
Jim
I learn something every day, and a lot of times it's that what I learned the day before was wrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384 |
give it a good look at your self, look at the barrels inside and out,look at the breech face , look for dent and bulges.look at the recoil shields for pits look at the ribs see if it looks original and not messed with(solder where it shouldnt be )check the stock for cracks (behind the lock plates)if you have an other gun you know is in good condition use it as a referance good luck. mc
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,423 Likes: 314
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,423 Likes: 314 |
From the beginning, LC 12g chambers were 2 3/4", unless otherwise marked, and we've found one marked 2 5/8" Lots of information here http://www.lcsmith.org/faq/faqhome.html
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,781
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,781 |
Isn;t that an unusual serial number for a !2 bore? Smith, made in 1911.MDC
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,423 Likes: 314
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,423 Likes: 314 |
Well done MD It's a 1919 gun per http://www.lcsmith.org/shotguns/manufacture.htmlIf the receiver is stamped OO, O, 1, etc. it's pre-1913. If stamped 'Field', 'I', 'S', etc. it's post 1913.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732 Likes: 52
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732 Likes: 52 |
Drew, neat to find one with those chambers. I brightened the picture up to get more information on it. First I thought it was a 1945 gun, left over parts when Marlin took over. Then realized that the lug was a Regular frame. So the final findings were 1906 ejector gun with the second style joint check (barrel stop), a real nightmare if the little spring breaks. I'm guessing someone had it made, for what I don't know. It has been argued that some of the trap guns were ordered with 3" chambers and then shot with 2 3/4" loads to give a better pattern going through the forcing cones on the way to the chokes. Why a 2 5/8" chamber, anybodies guess.
Last edited by JDW; 01/05/08 09:31 AM.
David
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
According to drawings in the L C Smith "Plans & Specifications" book standard chamber lengths were 10ga 2 7/8" 12ga 2 3/4" 16ga 2 9/16" & 20ga 2½". The .410 as I recall was first added @ 2½" & later increased to 3" with both 16 & 20 ga's also eventually being upped to 2 3/4". I would not think increasing the chamber length would have a pattern "Tightening" effect in the days of card & felt wadding. Almost every sourse I ever heard thought the reverse to be true. Many Gunmakers of the day intentionally "Short-Chambered their guns for the purpose of "Improved Patterns".
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732 Likes: 52
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732 Likes: 52 |
2-piper, only going along with what I have read. Another thing is why would avid trap shooters in the 20's buy 3" chambered guns. There had to be a reason, and I don't think it was that the gun was to be used for geese or ducks. These guys were pretty fanatical about the way their guns patterned.
David
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961 Likes: 9 |
A short chamber and a steep forcing cone will increase recoil and in a LCS this is bad for the head of the stock. Metal wise a LCS is strong but they have a weak stock so it is vital to hold down recoil by using light loads and modifying the chamber. The cost to restock a LCS is often more than the value of the gun. bill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
JDW; Shell cases of 3" length were readily available in the 20's. Unless you have absolute knowledge they were in fact using shorter shells in those guns I would think they were likely loading them with the longer hulls to allow a longer wad column for better gas sealing. Card & Felt wadding simply would not obturate enough in the "Gap" to allow for a perfect gas seal,, thus allowing gas to enter the shot charge, not a factor known to increase patterning ability. A longer column would better bridge the gap across the forcing cone. Otherwise I would simply mark it off to one of the idiosyncrasies of trap shooters & take it with a "Grain of Salt" regardless of the noteriety of the trap shooter.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4 |
Thanks everyone for your input...very helpful
|
|
|
|
|