|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,443
Posts544,791
Members14,405
|
Most Online1,258 Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,560 Likes: 70
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,560 Likes: 70 |
Now that makes sense . Thanks for the clarification . This is why I still come here!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,982 Likes: 106
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,982 Likes: 106 |
x
Last edited by buzz; 03/05/19 07:59 AM.
Socialism is almost the worst.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,773 Likes: 183
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,773 Likes: 183 |
So >>3245-46.59<< where the - denotes inclusion not a datastring. 3245 - 3246.59; so on a 2 barrel set why abbreviate that and not just stamp 3245 - 3246.59 to show it was inclusive. By the way, what year did the Brit issued Ferlach maker's number drop by the wayside. Cheers, Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,773 Likes: 183
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,773 Likes: 183 |
Proof number is a way of masking the actual maker in order to prevent preferential treatment @ the proof facility.
Cheers,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,763 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,763 Likes: 8 |
Why shorten the long stamping? Less work, of course The Brit left after a decade. So about 1955 and afterwards some makers kept the old system while others dropped it. Cheers, Jani
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,773 Likes: 183
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,773 Likes: 183 |
Less work, of course Indeed, less work. But just as the title of the thread suggests, much confusion. Serbus, Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,773 Likes: 183
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,773 Likes: 183 |
Josef Just 3 barrel set. I wonder if an example w/ more than 3 exits? Cheers, Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
|