|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
1 members (LRF),
848
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,501
Posts545,497
Members14,414
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 454 Likes: 149
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 454 Likes: 149 |
The radical feminists are on an all out war against anyone who disagrees with them. That may sound like a hard statement, but it is what I see.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97 |
long as we are given war casualty data by pres, here is the all time winner...
a. lincoln...no one knows fur sur, but latest estimates put the total some wares around...800,000...
careful about believin bull shit, like, save the union, free the slaves, or whatever...doin so can git alotta people killed and maimed...
Last edited by ed good; 10/02/18 11:21 AM.
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390 |
That's only partially correct Ed. Lincoln was not President of both the Union and the Confederates. They were two entirely different entities with different leaders. The Confederacy had seceded from the Union and counting casualties from both sides would be like including Iraqi military deaths in the total for U.S. casualties. So your inflated number is way off.
Some folks think we may be on the verge of another Civil War. The nation is as divided as it's ever been. The Liberals have already been using guerilla tactics such as the character assassination of Judge Kavanaugh. And it could be argued that they have already fired the first shots... with the Liberal Democrat shooting at Republicans and wounding Rep. Steve Scalise at a Congressional baseball game.... and the targeting and killing of Police Officers as a result of Liberal calls to kill cops. So if things really get going, who do you think will get the blame for U.S. casualties, since the shooting began under Obama's watch?
But just in.... BREAKING NEWS from the Democrats.... reports that Kavanaugh may be guilty of attempted murder for throwing a snowball at another kid while at recess in Kindergarten.... further FBI Investigations are needed in spite of, and in addition to, presumed guilt.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 25
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 25 |
ed good, I can't say how much I appreciate your straightening out Civil War history for me. I'd never have guessed that Lincoln's intention was to kill a record number of troops. I'd always thought he was serious about preserving the union. For sheer stupidity you share top honors with our loud-mouthed bully.
Bill Ferguson
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390 |
You put your insults in the wrong place Billy. I'll move it to your own thread in the Custom Rifle forum where I'm sure you actually intended to put your off-topic bullshit.
No need to thank me. But it is interesting to see that you consider my detailed reply to Tom C's question as bullying. I suppose you think it would have been better to run and hide from his question like you do.
Did you call or email to ask your Senators to stop the silly games and vote to confirm a pro-gun Supreme Court Justice yet? If not, then take your off-topic crap elsewhere and start your own thread to bash pro-gun Conservatives again.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97 |
well, keet, hit were yankee armies under de command o de great satan usurper dat violated the sovereignty of the southern states...heroic and righteous southern armies only invaded one northern state in a defensive effort to convince their northern brothers of the error of following the megalomaniac tyrant that was a. lincoln...
without lincoln, there would have been no war, and hence no casualties on either side...
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97 |
uh bill, some have suggested that lincoln's agenda for the first two years or so of the war was to create enough northern casualties, to cause the northern people to hate their southern brothers enough to pursue his unholy and unjust war...if so, it really explains why lincoln appointed so many inept generals to command his armies, until after vicksburg and gettysburg...by then, he had created enough hate and anger for revenge, that he put in his a team killers, with the likes of grant, sherman and sheridan in the lead...
and i excuse your insult, as you have been exposed to an intolerable amount of personal attacks here, that may have infected you wid keet syndrome...i may not agree with some of your views, but i do respect your willingness to share them here...
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 70
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 70 |
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
A fact that is easily proven. Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but I don't like it when the term "Liberalism" is applied to "Leftism". (And I also apologize if I am going too far off-topic.) Liberalism, as originally conceived by the likes of Jefferson, Locke, etc, was the belief in LIBERTY and freedom, especially economic freedom and individual rights (especially those of property, speech, and self-defense). Then Leftists later (around 1914, I believe) coopted the term with their doublespeak, as they are still wont to do, and twisted the meaning into something entirely different (see also "gun safety", "social justice", etc). If we allow Leftists to control the language like this, then they have already won half the battle, as the normies are quite often taken in by the doublespeak without knowing any better. Instead, let us take back the language, and discard their twisted doublespeak. So that being the case, I'm a "Liberal", because I believe in the ideas of freedom and individual liberty that our fine country was founded on. I'll call myself a "Classical Liberal", to differentiate myself from the Socialists, to the normies, I guess. For now. Instead, let's call them Leftists, Socialists, or even Communists in some cases, because that's what they really are. I don't think the term "Progressive" even really applies anymore. That's my opinion, anyway. But maybe I am full of sh*t. :3
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 247 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 247 Likes: 4 |
I normally ignore Ed's insane ramblings because i think he's mostly harmless. But i grew up in Illinois. Lived in Springfield for awhile. Have been to the Old State Capital, where Lincoln gave his famous "House Divided Against Itself" speech, many times. Toured the Lincoln Home in Springfield (only house Lincoln ever owned) many times. Been to the Lincoln Museum in Springfield many times (really good and highly recommended). And Ed's latest is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read here.
If you think the Southern states seceded for any reason other than their desire to maintain slavery, i encourage you to go read the secession statements by South Carolina, Texas, Mississippi, etc. It wasn't about state's rights or sovereignty or anything else. Lincoln was our greatest President. Full stop. Without him i do not believe the US as we know it today would exist.
Finally, Ed's statement that "some have suggested" whatever, is the lazy man's way of putting forth wacko theories. Who suggested? Where did they write it? What are their qualifications? You get the idea.
Nothing the government gives you is free.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487 Likes: 394
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487 Likes: 394 |
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
A fact that is easily proven. Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but I don't like it when the term "Liberalism" is applied to "Leftism". (And I also apologize if I am going too far off-topic.) Liberalism, as originally conceived by the likes of Jefferson, Locke, etc, was the belief in LIBERTY and freedom, especially economic freedom and individual rights (especially those of property, speech, and self-defense). Then Leftists later (around 1914, I believe) coopted the term with their doublespeak, as they are still wont to do, and twisted the meaning into something entirely different (see also "gun safety", "social justice", etc). If we allow Leftists to control the language like this, then they have already won half the battle, as the normies are quite often taken in by the doublespeak without knowing any better. Instead, let us take back the language, and discard their twisted doublespeak. So that being the case, I'm a "Liberal", because I believe in the ideas of freedom and individual liberty that our fine country was founded on. I'll call myself a "Classical Liberal", to differentiate myself from the Socialists, to the normies, I guess. For now. Instead, let's call them Leftists, Socialists, or even Communists in some cases, because that's what they really are. I don't think the term "Progressive" even really applies anymore. That's my opinion, anyway. But maybe I am full of sh*t. :3 I could not agree more. Language is important and the Left keep stealing words and twisting their meaning.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
