|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,467
Posts545,120
Members14,409
|
Most Online1,258 Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 331 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 331 Likes: 6 |
Send me a pm w address. I'll send the you 2 old Eley paper 14 ga hulls. You'll know for sure. I have 2 14 ga guns and no ammo, a few hulls, but not enough for a round of skeet. The last 14s I saw for sale were Eley papers from the 50s at $75 a box.
Joe in Charlotte
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 207 Likes: 2
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 207 Likes: 2 |
Somewhere in these pages I seem to recall modifying 16 ga to 14 ga by increasing the od of the hull using tape warped to fill the space. Would not paper hulls from Chedite cut to 2.5 inches and wrapped be possible? (probably work with plastic hulls as well). I'd use black powder and 7/8 oz shot. Card and fiber filler. A little pricy but the RMC brass hulls, about 30 would make for practical field use. Like making and using pin fire hulls for those guns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1 |
Do typical chambers meant for 12ga brass shells differ in diameter from chambers made for current production 12ga shells? Yes, gunmaker from Birmingham made some kind of chamber-less fowling gun called the 'Altro' designed for thin brass shells. I have only seen pictures, but it would seem cartridge case dimensions for it would be a lot different from standard offerings.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,018 Likes: 50
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,018 Likes: 50 |
J, your example of chamberless fowling gun is not of much use for the question asked. Chamber-less gun are relatively rare and not a standard chamber per the question asked.
2 piper hit it on the head. The relative chamber sizes were not different for early Breech loaders whether they fired all brass and paper and brass hulls. While some chambers are narrower than others it is not because they are meant specifically for brass hull..
Michael Dittamo Topeka, KS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 110 Likes: 21
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 110 Likes: 21 |
Sounds to me that your gun may well be a 14G brass case gun. W Ford was a recognised specialist maker of "fowling/pigeon guns, in which category your gun may fall. If you measure (gauge) the barrels at 9" from breech this will confirm whether the gun is a true 14 gauge or if it was built as a thin brass case gun, in which case the barrels will be 12 bore... designated as 14/12. Thin brass case 12 bores had 12 bore chambers and 10 bore barrel... known as 12/10. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,136 Likes: 37
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,136 Likes: 37 |
If the bore is 14ga what should the measurements read at 9" from the breech?
Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
16 gauge card & fiber wads would be unlikely to give a good seal in a 14 gauge barrel, & this would be particularly true should it turn out to be bored oversize for brass shells.
14 gauge = .693"; 14/1 = .701" & 13 = .710". 15 gauge = .677" & 15/1 = .685"
16 gauge = .662" & 16 gauge card & fiber wads have an OD of around +.020" or about .682". One can thus see they aren't going to seal in a .693" or larger bore.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 110 Likes: 21
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 110 Likes: 21 |
Having considered your dilemma a bit further, I think that you will have to take a series of internal diameter measurements of the chamber and the barrel to try and unravel the conundrum. W Ford the gunmaker was a renowned barrel borer and known for making "specials". Around 1880 he advocated reworking of chamber, cone and barrel forward of the normal position of the cone in converting paper-case chambered guns to brass-case guns - a rather controversial method, considered by others as likely to render the gun "out of proof". By doing the measurements you may get some insight as to whether the gun was originally built as a brass-case ("chamberless") gun or if it is a converted paper-case gun { assuming that the chamber and bore have not been "modified/cleaned-up/altered" at a later date, thereby only adding to the ??? history}.
|
|
|
|
|
|